English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The con-reps had a Republican president and control of Congress for six years. They had control of how America was to deal with foreign policy. The president said there were WMDs in Iraq, so we invaded. No WMDs. After nearly four years we still haven't brought Iraq under control. How do the con-reps deal with it ?
1.By saying that we wil win in Iraq despite evidence to the contrary.
2. By saying the reason we haven't won yet is because of liberal democrats.
According to con-reps it's not THEIR fault. Why are con-reps so lacking in the courage necessary to admit they are the one's primarily responsible for Iraq. And who in their right mind would respect anything they would have to say ?

2007-02-22 09:36:54 · 14 answers · asked by Count Acumen 5 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

Not all conservatives just the neocons and their supporters. Some standard conservatives may have blindly followed at first but I think they are finally waking up.

2007-02-22 09:43:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Your exactly why we may not win in Iraq.

1.Evidence to the contrary?! Have you EVER talked to any soldiers? Do you realize what has been done and what there doing? I doubt it. I doubt you even know how large a country Iraq is. Did you expect to be in and out in a month, a week, what???

2. It is because of people like you STUPID! At a time when everyone in the country should be united around our President you idiots criticize everything! Now you say you support the troops and yet don't want to send them the additional help there commander says they need! All you care about is power, not America.

Thank God you guys weren't around after D-Day for example. We would never have won.

AND, what the ***** is a con-rep you douche? Is that your hippie starbucks slang?

2007-02-22 09:45:33 · answer #2 · answered by Chester's Liver 2 · 0 1

Your precisely why we can't win in Iraq. a million.evidence on the different?! have you ever talked to any squaddies? Do you already understand what has been finished and what there doing? I doubt it. I doubt you even understand how large a u . s . a . Iraq is. Did you assume to be in and out in a month, a week, what??? 2. it rather is by persons such as you stupid! At a time on a similar time as everybody contained interior the country could be united around our President you idiots criticize each and each subject! Now you're saying you help the troops and yet do no longer prefer to furnish them the extra help there commander says they want! All you care approximately is means, now no longer u . s . a .. Thank God you person adult adult males weren't around after D-Day as an social accumulating. we'd below no circumstances have won. AND, what the ***** is a con-rep you douche? Is that your hippie starbucks slang?

2016-11-25 00:34:27 · answer #3 · answered by howsare 4 · 0 0

We failed? Sorry I missed the memo. Last I heard, not from the liberal media of course, our men and women in boots actually over there are quite confident the're winning and can.
As for wmd, the liberal media neglected to mention some things. Nerve gas is wmd, and was found. Oh yes, dare they not mention the truckloads that crossed the border into Syria before the invasion. "not to mantion" the paperwork showing an active program. The liberals don't want people to talk about these things, of course not. It blows their objective, Lose the war. Then when the terrorrists are here. They can go to a liberals door. Conservatives believe in defense.

2007-02-22 09:51:21 · answer #4 · answered by olhip48 2 · 0 1

What do you mean? They are the party of morals, surely they have enough integrity to admit when they are wrong and they aren't wrong. These things take time and commitment. Can you not see the great strides Iraq has taken in improving their becoming a strong democracy? Look at all the terrorists being killed each and every day in the streets of Iraq, soon there will no longer be any terrorists and the continued and stepped-up rebuilding efforts will be redoubled, and then I woke up.

2007-02-22 09:45:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It doesn't take character to call Iraq a failure, it takes cowardice. If you compare what has been accomplished in Iraq in 4 years to any other war in our history other than Desert Storm, it's illogical to declare it a failure. The only people that could make such a declaration are those that have no concept of history and are unaware of what is really occurring there.

Your question is as pointless as me asking "Why don't Democrats have enough character to admit they love killing unborn babies?"

2007-02-22 09:44:19 · answer #6 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 0 2

For the same reason the liberal democrats never took responsibility for Vietnam.

2007-02-22 09:41:12 · answer #7 · answered by snowball45830 5 · 0 1

who was to know that the insurgents would be such a hateful enemy? Your boy slick willy knew about wmd's, read your history, and the libs only have defeat in their mind. simply put, they do not want us to win this war! now, you tell me that any conservative needs to apologise for anything!!!!!!!

2007-02-22 09:43:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I did n't even have to read the rest(though I will) Your question answers itself.

2007-02-22 09:41:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because they believe it has been successful in a demented way.

2007-02-22 09:40:11 · answer #10 · answered by Groovy 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers