2007-02-22 08:22:59 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Damn...finally...yes.
2007-02-22 08:26:18 · answer #1 · answered by dj 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A year from now, Anna Nicole Smith will be a distant memory and where she is buried will be of little consequence to anybody, actually, except for her mother.
2007-02-22 08:59:50 · answer #2 · answered by Gnome 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they have wanting to bury her interior the Bahamas, next to her son. it really is what Anna Nicole continually wanted, and that is what she's getting. Howard ok. Stern and decide Seidlin tearfully agreed that she will be in a position to be buried next to her son, like she continually wanted.
2016-12-04 19:36:01 · answer #3 · answered by rothberg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the body did go to the closest living kin, which is her daughter. Even though the baby is only 5 months old, the court appointed guardian will be able to make that decision now. I think the judge made the right choice.
2007-02-22 08:30:40 · answer #4 · answered by ketchikan_chick 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it was the right decision. She should be buried next to her son.
2007-02-22 08:27:50 · answer #5 · answered by Kingsfan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anything you can do, doing it in the Bahamas is always a good idea.
2007-02-22 08:26:55 · answer #6 · answered by Craig L 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so she needs to be by her son and she bought the polts so that shoild have told everyone where she wanted to be buried
2007-02-22 08:26:18 · answer #7 · answered by lizzy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes because thats where her son is and she wanted to be because she bought a plot right next to him.
2007-02-22 08:26:16 · answer #8 · answered by Carolyn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure what to think regarding that whole fiasco anymore - what a mess!!
2007-02-22 08:26:52 · answer #9 · answered by Rachel 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-02-22 08:32:02 · answer #10 · answered by amberharris20022000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋