Should Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Law been jailed for criminal negligence in protecting pedophile priests?

Answer 1

There is no crime "protecting pedophile preists". What charge would you have suggested for Law (who had first hand knowledge)?

Answer 2

at the starting up tutor that he KNEW what Cardinal regulation became doing. i go with to trust that it became occurring without him understanding. If he KNEW about it and enable it ensue i'd lose fantastically a lot all appreciate for him so i go with to trust that it became kept from him. i do not study Cardinal Romero so i'm able to't say a lot about that. i'm no longer Catholic for the record. As to the condoms theory that is going adverse to their idea. you in effortless words ought to settle for some issues. Do you actually trust that condoms completely ward off the spread of AIDS? in case you do would I ask you in case you took a visit to Columbia lately. If no longer the position did you get regardless of you're on? sure it ought to help decrease the spread yet when the individuals were following the training of the Church tehn they likely would not be having sex. So no reason to say they could use condoms at the same time as there are one of those huge quantity of different guidelines they're breaking.

Answer 3

It's a novel idea but impractical.
The Pope couldn't be arrested in the Vatican because that is a domain separate from Italian governmental control.
And, even if he was arrested it would take many years of legal arguements before a trial could be held.
The Pope is a very old man.
Cardinal Law is another matter.

Answer 4

Under who's jurisdiction? What are they going to prosecute themselves or extradite themselves to America? Are American federal agents supposed to rush the Vatican, abduct them, and bring them to America?

And why should they be held responsible for the priests' acts? The priests did what they did by their own judgement, not the church's orders.