English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

he lost the presidential race in '01...

now he hasta make up another campaign based on unsubstancial evidence which sounds good to people who don't know the whole truth...

which is 90% of the population it seems today...

Gore + many other Dem's policy (like congress) ---
tell the people what they want to hear.. even if its not true, it sounds good. and good things get you votes!

Gore just wants his name written somewhere.. if it cant be a presidency.. then it might as well be a Nobel Peace Prize.

Tell every1 they are going to die if they dont support your theory about co2 pollution...

Then fly home in a private jet.

when you get to the air-port.. take a nice ride home in your gas-guzzling Cadillac Escalade while listening to some Fat Joe..

when you get home, pop out a nice bowl of cereal and look out your oil-heated house's window.. observe the way the birds fly and the way your toxic waste dump you own emits more co2 in one day then a window-ac (which produces enough co2 to fill your entire home 4 times in 1 day) in 30+ days....

Yea.. thats the Democrat Al Gore's way!!

PROFIT: not $$ wise, by celebrity status wise...

2007-02-22 08:28:09 · answer #1 · answered by Corey 4 · 1 0

How DARE you, Sir you are so wrong on many levels! Al Gore has flown 3 million miles in a 747 for almost 14 years making many speechs about Global warming to millions of people.What have you done ? Do you know the emisions from a jet engine can do to the ozone ? His message is so important that he is willing to take that risk.

2007-02-22 16:16:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Since when is making a profit a bad thing? Anyway, this man is driven for a cause and it's something he's passionate about. I wish I had a job I was that passionate about, could get the word out and make a decent living.

2007-02-22 16:09:53 · answer #3 · answered by Groovy 6 · 0 0

For himself? A profit. For America? A loss.

2007-02-22 16:13:13 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 0

neither. global warming has gone on too long to change it's course; sort of like putting on the brakes after you've driven off the cliff.
It makes him a well meaning absurdity

2007-02-22 16:12:45 · answer #5 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0 0

He wants it to help him get The White House. But we're not gonna let him! Run Newt, Run!

2007-02-22 16:13:24 · answer #6 · answered by Goggles 7 · 0 0

I vote profit.

2007-02-22 16:09:43 · answer #7 · answered by rmoss9686 3 · 0 0

I dunno. I heard him talking about his new project. 7 concerts on 7 continents on 7/7/07. Obviously this is going to raise money. What he will do with that money I dont know.

2007-02-22 16:09:47 · answer #8 · answered by sociald 7 · 0 0

He is not a scientist. He is a socilist politician.

2007-02-22 16:18:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

HE IS A SPOKESMAN EDUCATING PEOPLE ABOUT IT. IM SURE HE MAKES FAR LESS FOR THAT POSITION THAN BUSHS SPIN GROUPS

2007-02-22 16:10:37 · answer #10 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers