in the Anna Nicole body remains case was genuinely distressed or was he acting for the cameras and for Hollywood agents?
2007-02-22 08:03:29 · 9 answers · asked by dandyl 7 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
i don't know i got the idea of him acting for the cameras since he is trying out for his own show.
2007-02-22 08:36:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Judge Larry Seidlin is who I think he is (Judge Judy's ex) then that explains alot! If you woke up next to that witch every day you'd be distressed too!!!!!
2007-02-22 08:41:10 · answer #2 · answered by BRIAN P 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
F. He might make a reliable decide. besides, he empathized with the human beings who known in front of him yet he ruled based on the regulation no longer emotion. besides, there is not any longer a decide available who does no longer dream of having a television judgeship. decide Judy averages $13 million a year, on a similar time as a universal decide makes approximately $one hundred,000.
2016-10-16 06:34:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's such a circus... I'm sure he was overstressed and felt genuine sympathy for this poor dead crazy girl and her child.
2007-02-22 08:16:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he was genuine. His decision was not an easy one. Personally, I think he made the right decision.
2007-02-22 14:14:14 · answer #5 · answered by jorst 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say he was genuinely distressed.
2007-02-22 08:11:39 · answer #6 · answered by gaban24 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he was rather off beat i would day adhd_________by all means topic jumped all the time and made it a true circus--------although i really do think everyone had names not
2007-02-22 12:43:05 · answer #7 · answered by ladysosureone 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he made a class "A' clown of himself throughout the hearings.
2007-02-22 11:02:36 · answer #8 · answered by patriot07 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was pure act....
2007-02-24 09:44:49 · answer #9 · answered by Sterling D W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋