English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Recently, a well-known and respected scholar did some research. He conducted over 2500 interviews over 3 years with men and women aged between 17 and 45. His findings were published in a known national paper.
Do women have rights? Yes 21.4% no 70.8 undecided 7.3
Should women stay in the home? Yes 89.9% no 3.8
Are most AA women 'street workers'? Yes 97.4% no 0.8
Should AA men and women be sent back to Africa? Yes 97.9 no 0.1
Given a choice, would women be A) educated? Yes 12.6% no 75.8
B) The right to vote? Yes 9.6% no 86.9
C) The right to work? Yes 2.8% no 96.7
D) To be treated as equals? Yes 1% no 96.7
Who are better equipped to look after children? Men 3.8% women 78.3
Should American schools be segregated? Yes 91.7% no 5.2
Do women have the right to refuse a mans advances? No 98.2% no 0.9
Does a man have the right to dominate any woman? No 34.8% yes 52.2
Where is a woman’s traditional place? Kitchen 45.5% working 2.5 streets 21.7 bedroom 29.3
PROVE ME WRONG IF YOU CAN

2007-02-22 07:48:26 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

35 answers

If this is such a well known factual substantiated research study why not tell us where to find it and who wrote it. Anyone can make up silly fact and say that they are true. Credibility in research is what is actually important. Professional integrity doesn't mean that you cannot be named and back up such a survey. That is if there actually was one, which I highly doubt.

2007-02-22 09:40:41 · answer #1 · answered by Deirdre O 7 · 1 0

Lord Raven i wish i could agree with you but even after all that has happened i cant find it in my heart to agree with this survey.
And yes a source is required as you are quoting data for credibility.
This is coming from a guy whose questions if you check out you will have no doubt left what i'am talking about.I always ask evrything from from the fire within my heart.

There are more people on this planet who even though have had a bad deal still have faith in humanity,I being one of them.This survey smacks of chauvanism or women hating which is the other extreme of feminists and ballbusters.

I beleive both genders should beleive in humanity first and then think about a penis or a vagina.

Men and women should both be equal and if they have stenghts and weaknesses they should be accepted and respected by each other.

The reason i dont even want to dream that this should be true is because you have mothers,susters,wives and daughters what about them????

Hell feminists have gone a bit too far but but we shouldnt do that otherwise there would be no difference.

So i think this is an emotional rather than an clinical survey.Ia'm sorry mate.

2007-02-22 11:00:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Should women stay in the home? Yes 89.9% no 3.8 = 93.7%
Are most AA women 'street workers'? Yes 97.4% no 0.8=98.2%
Should AA men and women be sent back to Africa? Yes 97.9 no 0.1 = 98%

Given a choice, would women be A) educated? Yes 12.6% no 75.8 = 88.4%
D) To be treated as equals? Yes 1% no 96.7 = 97.7%
ALL THESE DO NOT ADD UP TO 100%

Do women have the right to refuse a mans advances? No 98.2% no 0.9
THEY ARE BOTH NO

2007-02-23 09:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To quote Phoenix Wright: OBJECTION!

There is no such thing as "truth." Granted, this is a profound statement, but hear me out. Did you do the tests? And if so, is this exactly how you phrased the questions, so as to not sound racist in some way? Here's my point: if you didn't conduct the tests, there's no way of knowing whether or not the research is true.

Now, here are my thoughts. Do I like my woman in the bedroom? ABSOLUTELY! Preferably with nothing on. Do I like my woman in the kitchen? ABSOLUTELY! I'm a lazy bastard, but that's also because I'm going to college WHILE trying to raise a child AND work full time and ALSO I'm not that much of a cook, ergo my recent purchase of a cookbook that I intend to use...eventually.

Here's another problem...how many men participated in this test? And women? If there were more men than women testing, your results are faulty. One more problem...where the same questions asked to men and women? Were there different questions per race or was it all objective?

Was it an equal number of blacks, hispanics, asians, whites, etc., or was it skewed? Was it deliberately skewed to reflect the population? Was this done in just America or worldwide? If you say worldwide, then you already have subjective evidence.

One final note: I believe women should, in fact, be anywhere possible...office, streets, or otherwise. In fact, I'd go on to say there aren't enough of them in such fields as IT and what have you that are supposedly "male dominated."

Of course, one thing that's risked upon this: who you are and what you are. Carlos Mencia brought up an interesting point (though comedically) on Mind of Mencia. He stated that you can't have both (actually, this may have been stand up, but whatever).

See, women want to be, well...women. And yet, they feel they also have a right to enter male dominated atmospheres wherein there are LOTS of sex jokes, etc. Here's the thing...why should men bend for you? On top of that, if you want to go into a male dominated field, you should understand that this is what you're coming into, not progress the attitude that "you should change for me because I said so."

Yes, I'm very anti-PC. That much isn't going to change anytime soon. Women...you SHOULD work in these businesses for two reasons. One, eye candy. Sorry...we likes the womens! Two, diversity. We don't think about the kind of stuff you do! Fill us in!

And hey, don't get offended. We mean you no harm, really. In fact, there's a good chance you could make jokes 10 times more offensive toward men than we ever could toward you! So in summation, I say this...does it matter if you're black or white? No.

Does it matter if you're male or female? No. Always assume everything's rigged. That's my motto. If I don't trust in something, I investigate. I don't try to disprove it, I just try to get a second or third opinion...that's all.

2007-02-22 08:08:08 · answer #4 · answered by gunsage 2 · 1 0

If he was well-known and respected then he should probably have a name, first of all, and the fact that you didn't provide that here says to me it could be any Joe Smith making up numbers to post on Yahoo! Answers and look like a dick. But even if it was real research, a study of 2500 could be easily biased, so one would have to describe the conditions and sampling techniques used in the study to validate it. And by the way, these aren't facts these are opinions that may or may not have come from intelligent human beings.

2007-02-22 07:53:59 · answer #5 · answered by Lowa 5 · 0 0

women have the same rights as men today. we can vote just as men can, we can have basically the same jobs, we can join the military if we choose, and we can get an education just like men. women should not stay at home unless they choose to be a home maker. we have the same opportunity to go to college and get a degree so that we can do something important with our lives just as men do. we have the right to vote and work as mentioned above. we are treated equally with males today, unlike in the old times when women were treated unfairly. women are probably better equipped to raise children since they are the ones who give birth to the children. american schools should not be segregated. we are all equal, free human beings, no matter what gender we are or what skin color we are. males have the right to dominate over women because it says in the bible, but that does not mean he can treat her like a servant. a womans traditional place should be wherever she chooses for it to be! :)

2007-02-22 07:56:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Evolution isn't performed by potential of persons. Selective breeding/darwinism (survival of the fittest) is what drives evolution. persons do each in specific situations have genetic mutations that if effective, will help insure survival and duplicate. The trait is then handed on. as an occasion... think of there is an animal that eats leaves from a undeniable tree. As time is going on those leaf eaters devour each and all of the leaves they might attain. through fact the accessible depart start to vanish from intake, the shorter ones will never be waiting to devour and could die. The taller ones will proceed to devour and proceed to exist. As this occurs they are reproducing with one yet another. over the years the taller one is, the extra in all hazard this is to proceed to exist longer and reproduce. Tall mothers and dads make tall offspring etc till a lot time has handed and additionally you notice there are not any extra short animals in this species. This species is now the renowned-day giraffe. None of them incredibly more advantageous throughout the time of a single existence span. They selectively breed till the species more advantageous as an entire. attempt to picture of it in a similar fashion human beings create specific dogs breeds. They discover specific dogs with a wanted trait and breed them and not the others that don't show what they are looking for. proceed this technique over the years and additionally you get some thing like a Teacup Poodle. A Poodle that replaced into finished by potential of breeding the smallest Poodles they might discover till a sparkling breed replaced into created.

2016-10-16 06:32:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WHAT DO YOU MEAN PROVE YOU WRONG? SO you agree with this crap? We are not living in the stone age anymore! Whoever did this survey (if it's a real one at all) obv. didnt have a large, diverse demograpic of people to get answers from. They need to take a stats class #1to conduct surveys in the way they are meant to be conducted, #2 they need to take a few sociology classes to understand the diversity of this country that we live in and then maybe conduct a more 'real' survey.

The results of this survey are biased, racist and sexist and for you to even want feedback on a survey that smells like BS 50,000 miles away is disappointing and downright respectful...

Shame on you...

2007-02-22 08:02:22 · answer #8 · answered by 100% Woman, yes indeed! 3 · 0 0

What was the name of this national paper again? I'll prove you wrong, but first you have to prove that this ever existed. This is like me saying that a recent anonymous internet poll concluded that:

People thought that Lord Raven was
A) an idiot...0%
B) a biggot...0%
C) a sexist...0%
or D) all of the above...100%

Yes, and this survey result was based on 100,000 worldwide votes, each with a different IP address, with a standard deviation of .018%

2007-02-22 08:10:10 · answer #9 · answered by larsor4 5 · 2 0

You must be a Muslim living in Iraq.

You curtainly do not have a wife nor a girl friend.

Some of what you stated as facts are women's rights and can get you some jail time if you refuse women those right in the United Staes of America.

2007-02-23 14:19:41 · answer #10 · answered by smially 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers