Sorry, but the liberals are the ones who are more sympathetic to child molestors. Heck, Nancy Pelosi is a supporter of the group defending Man/Boy love. Talk about defending perverts. That's the Democrat party.
2007-02-22 07:17:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It all depends on what you tell them as to why you dont want them within 300 feet of Bush supporters.
2007-02-22 15:02:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by lovelylady6010 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
My children are within 300 feet of one right now. Actually they are about 3 feet away from me as we speak.
2007-02-22 14:58:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by sesamenc 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, it's safer than allowing them within 100 feet of Hillary Clinton or within 500 feet of PETA supporters.
2007-02-22 14:58:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by frankmoore 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is it safe to allow our children within 300 feet of Pot smoking hippies? Maybe that's unfair, I don't have a problem with hippies, or people who have a different viewpoint than mine, but this question is absurd.
2007-02-22 15:05:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by asmith1022_2006 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a lot safer than allowing them within 1 foot of any Clinton and less than a foot near Hillary
2007-02-22 15:05:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Bush supporters only want to protect fetuses. They don't care about children once they are born.
2007-02-22 15:02:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by diogenese_97 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
when people like you allow hillary clinton into office and she takes away all your parental rights so that the government can raise your kids, then i want you to answer your own question
2007-02-22 15:04:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by jktoosweet_1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You like being a troll? You think being insulting is an effective way of influencing public opinion?
2007-02-22 14:58:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Much safer than allowing them near someone who is fearful and hateful.
2007-02-22 14:57:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋