if you want...i can change the information...as we speak and it will take time for them to fix it...
in other words the information will be wrong?
why do people reference it and trust it so much...and why do they score so high on the google list?
2007-02-22 06:52:05 · 5 answers · asked by ? 3 in Computers & Internet ➔ Internet
wikipedia can't really be trusted. same articles are locked to the public, and are pretty true, but generally you're more safe not using it if at all possible
2007-02-22 06:58:55 · answer #1 · answered by Ryderman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From what I've been reading Wikipedia is weak on very current events where there can be a lot of emotion involved. But there is a panel that does edit the information that users enter, so the info may be there for a short period of time before it's removed. In any event Wikipedia talks about it's own strengths and weaknesses.
2007-02-22 07:24:23 · answer #2 · answered by Alan 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends if your search is basically to inform you or to study for an exam it is a very useful tool. However, if you are doing a research paper or an analysis paper is not recommended. Several teachers discourage the use of Wikipedia, because if you are a member of Wikipedia you can pretty much add whatever information that comes to you. Therefore if you are doing a research try the websites that end with .org, .gov or .edu
2007-02-22 07:01:12 · answer #3 · answered by berny 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And the position did you're saying you went to college lower back ? in simple terms kidding... i wager that Wikipedia has develop into extra commonplace by the years, and at the same time as I absolutely have discovered Wiki to be very precise/sensible, it remains no longer commonplace by mainstream academia as a respected source and particular not at all will be. it really is because of the very truth you touched on -- suggestion will be there at present and lengthy gone/edited tomorrow because it really is maintained by the consumer community. some articles will be "vandalized" and deliberately rewritten with info distorted, and others written in reliable faith, yet that contain own bias. straight forward way round this ? commence with Wiki, yet then at the same time as reference their footnotes which convey about the unique article or source.this can stay clear of the entire problem altogether. (Ex. "John became born in 1973" - locate the subsequent footnote that links to the Chicago Tribune or regardless of, and then reference that as a replace of Wiki...in simple terms make positive THEIR web page nevertheless exists too, and that its no longer a useless link.)
2016-12-04 19:30:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well because it's a trustworthy site, and it helps people finding information, and they'll notice if you change it.
2007-02-22 07:02:01 · answer #5 · answered by need_help_wants_a_mac 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋