English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or do Iraqi lives matter to them at all?

2007-02-22 06:38:40 · 25 answers · asked by aiminhigh24u2 6 in Politics & Government Politics

25 answers

Who is doing the slaughtering?

2007-02-22 06:41:30 · answer #1 · answered by Mike_Hustle 2 · 1 0

Wow

So the WWJD president starts a war of aggression against a country based on specious information; that war ends up killing 10s of thousands of Iraqi civilians, and now you want to know if Iraqi lives mean something to us.

Wasn't this a question you should have been asking of the current administration 5 years ago?

2007-02-22 06:43:19 · answer #2 · answered by zaphodsclone 7 · 1 0

We are already responsible for the death of tens of thousands of Iraqis so - no, their lives don't matter to Bush and his henchmen.

No matter when we leave, there is going to be a slaughter..(I refer you to the killing fields after Vietnam - read about it, you might learn something).. Retribution and revenge will run rampant in Iraq whether we leave now or 10 years from now....Bush created this mess and his administration will live with it.

The sooner we bring our soldiers home, the fewer soldiers will die. It was criminal to start this war, it is criminal to continue it...bring our troops home and hang our heads in shame at the slaughter.

2007-02-22 06:51:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iraqi's matter not to the Defeatacrats
Only surrender and retreat
WINNING was never an option with the surrender monkeys as their HATE for America from loosing the 2000 and 2004 elections to loosing in IRAQ is the only plan they had or will have
Loose at all cost is the mantra

2007-02-22 06:45:53 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 1

By a majority of senior analysts the American presence is making the average Iraqi's life worse. Foobar is the Dumbya legacy. There is NO yellow brick road from here to the Wizard's castle. With Dumbya running the show this is just a continuing orgy of theft by the Dumbya Coup.

2007-02-22 08:02:44 · answer #5 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1 0

You, no doubt, are speaking of the Democratic Party. Well, our being there has not stopped the killing of the Iraqi people, has it?
In case you haven't noticed, this is now a Civil Religious War & we don't belong in it! Why should Americans die in a war that can only be won between the factions who are at war. Whose side should we take? We need to subtract ourselves from this equasion & let them have at it!

2007-02-22 06:50:53 · answer #6 · answered by geegee 6 · 1 0

the democratic social gathering isn't calling for "cutting and working" yet for a actual new plan. Bush's plan, increasing troop stages, isn't something new... troop stages are greater and decreased on a similar scale each and all of the time. It replaced right into a stupid trick to attempt to call this a sparkling approach in simple terms through fact the human beings started stressful a sparkling approach... it fairly is not even a foul new approach, it fairly is in simple terms no longer a sparkling approach in any respect. And the Iraqi human beings understand it as extra of a similar and are turning against us in extra beneficial numbers. i'm in all hazard as liberal as all human beings you comprehend and that i do no longer trust the belief-approximately "cut back and run". despite the fact that, leaving troops in Iraq with out plan to realize peace is even worse... it is going to unfold instability which will fulfill Bush's dream of becoming a terrorist danger to final generations. by potential of how, the place have been you for the "adverse Iraqi human beings" whilst the liberals have been speaking out against use of cluster bombs, white phosphorous, and the torture of human beings who might or will possibly no longer have had something to do with terrorism?

2016-10-16 06:25:49 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Where have you been for the last 4 years?Have you noticed the thousands upon thousands already slaughtered?Why don't you ask your president why the hell he went to war with a country that was in no way,shape,or form any threat whatsoever to the United States?Why don't you ask him why when the first justification was exposed as a pack of lies,he came up with another?And when that justification went down the tubes,he came up with another?On and on it goes until now,we're at the point of we're killing them to save them.

Rivers of blood have been spilled,we're coming up to a trillion dollars wasted,most of which has come from outside the pretend budget that they foist on us.The Chinese have us by the balls,because 90% of that war debt is debt they hold.Mr."Support The Troops"Bush is trying to cut funding to the VA when thousands of wounded are needing its help.

What is the Party Of Lie And Deny going to say when the Chinese decide to call in that debt?What is The Party Of Lie And Deny going to say to the wounded vets when Mr.Bush's cuts in VA spending kick in?What is The Party OF Lie And Deny going to say when our children are living in a third world country because of their reckless spending?Well?!?

2007-02-22 07:04:36 · answer #8 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 0 0

1)They will say its all Bush's fault and that we are the ones who made all the terrorists that are now killing thousands so its all our fault.

2)Others will say there were no terrorists and everyone is paid by the CIA to slaughter those people to make the republicans look like they were right, and Osama Bin Laden is in skull and bones and this is all part of a world domination conspiracy that would make pinky and the braing cringe.

3)Sit in their rooms and cry knowing the blood of thousands of the people who they thought they were fighting for are now dripping from their hands and drenching their clothes.

*Hint* : It probably won't be #3.

2007-02-22 06:52:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

you sure seem to have bought into GWB's propaganda. I'm wondering why we're staying in Iraq fighting terrorists that are pouring over border instead of taking the battle to them? As long as we fight the war on their terms the enemy's infrastructure remains intact and we get our resources drained. we need to take on the terrorists at their training sites. you know, they train outdoors and we take satellite photos and pretty much can find them but Bush wants this conflict to last another 2 years.

2007-02-22 06:53:59 · answer #10 · answered by Alan S 7 · 1 0

If we left, then not one would get slaughtered. Iraqi lives ought to be important, but that shoud be for the Iraqui people to work out for themselves, in my opinion.

2007-02-22 06:43:41 · answer #11 · answered by profile image 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers