GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY!!
Karma's a b*tch though.
He'll get his.
2007-02-22 05:40:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by cici 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have always thought that OJ was guilty, even since the beginning. The problem we have here is that American Justice system let him go. The African American community was happy to see him aquitted not because they thought he was innocent, but because this justice system has screwed them over for so long. Many African Americans are behind bars right now wrongly accused. OJ Simpson walking was a big wake up call for everyone. It showed how broken this justice system is.
2007-02-22 14:36:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Alex S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
"OJ is guilty but not of Murder" author William C. Dear. Everyone who thinks he actully committed the murders should buy this book. Mr. Dear is a detective who studied this case for 6 years after the murders, he concludes that OJ's son Jason, who was 25 at the time commtted the murders when a argument between Nicole and Jason got out of hand. He details Jason's history of having a rage disorder, his previous arrest for stabbing his boss, and cutting his former girlfriends hair off with chef knifes among many other things! Take note people! If we all remember back when these murders took place, the two people OJ got a lawyer for was for himself and his son Jason. Why? Think about it and do some research. But that was quickly forgotten. Jason was on medication at the time for his rage disorder. Why was his prints at the scene etc. Dear believes Jason called him after flipping out and told him what happen and OJ went to the scene to see for himself thus leaving some evidence. Yes he maybe guilty, But not of Murder!! OJ loved himself too much to go out like that and lose everything by killing his ex wife. His ex best friend Hall of Fame RB Marcus Allen ended up sleeping with Nicole after they divorced he didn't flip out then! He witnessed her performing oral sex on a guy in their living room while his kids were home. He didn't kill her then? I believe OJ was covering for his son. If there was anybody you would cover for it would be your child. OJ stated that "he didn't committ this crime, but he was responsible". OJ always felt guilty for not putting the time in with Jason and for being hard on him while he was growing up for not being as athleticly inclined like himself. Do your research everyone.
2007-02-22 13:52:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Willie Survive 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why did OJ drive the Bronco to the crime scene?
It was the only way he could carry all the evidence.
In my opinion, the man is guilty. But the standard legal caveats would apply - I don't know, wasn't on the jury, presumption of innocence, etc., etc. He COULD BE innocent, but I doubt it.
2007-02-22 12:53:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by MithrilHawk 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Guilty.
2007-02-22 13:41:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by stan l 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Guilty.
2007-02-22 12:55:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Teddy Bear 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No honest person believes O.J. Simpson, Robert Blake, or the Rodney King or Reginald Denny attackers are innocent, or that the justice system works in Southern California.
2007-02-22 13:53:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Patrick 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, even though it has been a long time O.J. had the best lawers ever like a dream team of lawyers. I think he is guilty because he was going to make a book "If I Did It". That to me is evidence he killed Nicole Simpson ,Newsday Magizine/newspaper and MSNBC agrees also.
2007-02-22 16:23:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by []D[][]V[][]D 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Guilty as charged .. But darn we don`t always get it Right.
Imperfect system,but its the best we have for now..On the
other hand, way to many innocents are found guilty and punished..
2007-02-22 20:56:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Robert B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i still believe that oj is guilty. the only thing that kept him from being jailed was his money
2007-02-22 12:54:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by ynra BTB 4-18-09 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
In the words of Cedric the Entertainer "OJ DID IT".
2007-02-22 12:56:38
·
answer #11
·
answered by MJMGrand 6
·
1⤊
0⤋