resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands of people. Choose the one that deserves impeachment more.
2007-02-22 03:57:16 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No WMDs = False pretenses
2007-02-22 04:24:56 · update #1
No WMDs = False pretenses
2007-02-22 04:24:59 · update #2
Well one has been proved...your boy Clinton did lie to a GRAND JURY, which is a crime...the other, there is no real proof, except to a few uneducated people who just go by what they read on the Internet...
2007-02-22 04:01:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
I don't buy "false pretenses". Saddam had so many warnings about his WMDs, they are very well hidden and may never be found.
You can't impeach bad strategy, which is what the current result of our presence in Iraq is.
I'm not sure Bill Clinton needed impeachment. But, he just should have admitted what he did.
2007-02-22 12:26:15 · answer #2 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Clinton said there were WMD before Bush was in office. He lied under oath- perverting justice -- but that is ok in the lib play book it seems.n
2007-02-22 12:50:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a concept I hope many of you will soon wrap your minds around!
Both Bush and the Clintons are globalists!
Peas of the same pod!
This globalization movement has been going on and gaining momentum since Nixon!
We need representatives that are for the United States ---not for taking over control of the world's economy and killing and imprisoning Americans to do it!!!!
By encroaching on the constitution!
2007-02-22 12:07:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sorry, Clinton was convicted/impeached and there is absolutely no proof of the false pretense thingy.
2007-02-22 12:21:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
One man lied under oath.
The other man went to war with the support from Congress. President Bush went to war with the best intel he had. Hindsight is 20/20.
2007-02-22 12:02:42 · answer #6 · answered by Matt 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
To those who keep going on and on about Clinton getting Bin Laden....
Bush has been in office for six years, how is his hunt for Bin Laden going?
fools
2007-02-22 12:06:10 · answer #7 · answered by Rick 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
your question is moot, we are in a war and we cannot go backwards! There were dems and republicans together who voted for this war, we are there, let's be there to win! Please stop whining about what got us into Iraq....it's what we do with the current situation that matters!!!!!!!
2007-02-22 12:10:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
One lied about who he had sex with while he should have tried to get terrorist leader bin laden, the other tried to get bin laden.
2007-02-22 12:02:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
When Clinton lied no one died.......Impeach Bush and Chaney both.
2007-02-22 12:00:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋