English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you would have everything you would ever need and it was a beautiful south sea Island would you go for it? If it meant you would live the rest of your life alone.

2007-02-22 03:41:55 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Psychology

11 answers

off course not, and do u know why?

it is because, i can here my existence from voice of a friend.

if u be alone, u never will grow as u should be, because most of our growing is because of our relationships.
some part of us will grow even with bad people.

2007-02-24 22:46:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This was my first duty station and my last duty station. It's a great place to live. You will both be working, that's for sure. Why Hilo though? That's a huge change from California. I don't think that would work. When you are ready to retire move to Hilo. Unless you grew up in Hawaii, that would be a hard to place to live. Prices here are about the same as San Fran for housing and I would say 25% more for food. Probably 30% higher than LA overall. Get out of California! I left there in 1980 and would never move back.

2016-05-23 23:06:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ah, the life of a hermit, recluse, cloister, anchoress - whatever term you want to apply to it. Since very few people are comfortable being alone for any length of time, I suspect very few people will answer your question "yes"...

Most people historically who have chosen a life of seclusion or solitude have done so to develop a closer, deeper understanding of their faith and a more intimate relationship with their creator (whatever their belief structure is). Historically these people were not giving up access to instant worldwide communication, either. They were simply closing themselves away from whatever tiny sphere of the world they lived in.

I would do it, but I understand that there are times it would be very difficult - even more so in an age where we are members of the global village.

2007-02-22 04:24:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, as long as I had food, shelter, a comfortable place to sleep and books, paper and a pen I could live quite well on my own. This is my favorite day dream - alone and relaxed reading, drawing, exploring - no nagging and social pressure. Yes - I could do it.

2007-02-22 03:52:55 · answer #4 · answered by Walking on Sunshine 7 · 1 0

ALONE, you say? Crud, I almost went. No, I'll stay with what I've got going now. Even at the end of my days, I hope somebody'll be there to see me off . . .

2007-02-22 04:00:25 · answer #5 · answered by Zeera 7 · 0 0

No, I hate to be mushy but I couldn'y live without my husband, mum and sister. I don't think I could function without them

2007-02-22 03:45:39 · answer #6 · answered by joanna b 2 · 1 0

I wouldn't even if I had everything I need. I'll be so lonely. no wife,nobody to talk to. It will be so boring.

2007-02-22 03:47:13 · answer #7 · answered by BigJay 2 · 1 0

no i would be too lonely but it does sound like a nice getaway from everyone deal

2007-02-22 03:49:59 · answer #8 · answered by Cheer Barbie 3 · 1 0

No I wouldn't, because I'd rather starve to death then not have my friends around.

2007-02-22 03:53:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'd probably commit suicide after two days.

2007-02-22 03:48:59 · answer #10 · answered by Give life. Be an organ donor! 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers