Nations never go to war over what is morally right or wrong. Expansionism or maintaining the status quo is always the motivation for war. Moral issues are only used to justify a war and convince the populace to take arms.
Nations posture for war long before its outbreak. They wait for the spark that brings national outrage. The sinking of the Maine and the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11 were all events that sparked wars in which battlelines had already been drawn and allies already chosen. Every war presents an economic advantage for the victor.
9/11 was the spark that drew Americans into the Middle-East. But what is the economic advantage to be obtain? The notion of controlling oil resources seems weak. America could have easily invented its way out of oil dependency for less than the overall cost of the Iraq war.
So, what is the underlying reason that the USA is expending so much of its wealth and the lives of its youth on Iraq? How is the wealth of the country at stake?
2007-02-22
02:53:33
·
5 answers
·
asked by
.... . .-.. .-.. ---
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Both World War I & II started over expansionism of the Axis powers. Both were war over economics.
2007-02-22
03:01:11 ·
update #1
Both WWI & WWII disrupted international trade from the Americas. In its declaration of war against Germany in WWI, Brazil openly admitted it entered the war because German U Boat activity in the Atlantic was destroying its trade with Europe.
The USA entered the war for the same reason.
This isn't to say the reasons were wrong.
Moral issues can always be settled without warfare.
2007-02-22
03:07:39 ·
update #2