Check out this posted just minutes ago on the web for the whole story.
http://www.thestar.com/artsentertainment/article/184592
2007-02-22 02:59:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by looking4answers 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
do any of us really know all the circumstances involved? Maybe she wasn't paying attention when she was driving, but that describes the majority of people driving. It could've been a true "accident'. It doesn't seem to be an intentional thing. As far as I know she wasn't drinking, so there was nothing criminal. From what I've read she was on the freeway going 65 (which I believe is the speed limit) and the cars slowed down for some reason, she didn't notice and rear ended a 2005 Toyota. The Toyota then hit a 1989 Toyota. The 2005 Toyota then slid sideways and hit the center divider. As the 2005 Toyota came to a halt, it was struck by a 1988 Acura. It sounds like it was all an accident. How many times have any of us been caught when traffic slows down quickly in front of you. Don't you breath a sigh of relief when you can stop in time and haven't you seen others rear end someone when they can't. Brandy should receive some sort of punishment (fines, community services, etc) but if it was just an accident and not something intentional or criminal then why should she go to prison. If this were an average, everyday person they propably wouldn't be charged or would just receive the fines, etc. You say you are sick of people defending her because she's "Brandy" but you seem to want excessive punishment for her because she is "Brandy." Yes, it is sad that someone died, but it does seem to be an accident. Everyone has accidents from time to time. But to say someone needs to do "heavy jail time" for an unintentional act is mean.
2016-05-23 23:00:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kind of. In Los Angeles., she was driving a Land Rover at 65 mph and did not notice that cars in front of her had slowed considerably. Brandy's vehicle struck a 2005 Toyota. The Toyota then hit a 1989 Toyota. The 2005 Toyota then slid sideways and hit the center divider. As the 2005 Toyota came to a halt, it was struck by a 1988 Acura. The driver of the 2005 Toyota, a 38 year old mother, died the next day.
2007-02-22 02:54:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. she caused an accident by running into the back of a car that hit another and caused the driver to loose control and hit the wall median.
Brandi is now being sued by the ladies family.
2007-02-22 02:55:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ms. Sunshine 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
She wasn't paying attention to traffic--it had slowed down ahead of her and she slammed into someone's car, propelling that person's vehicle into other traffic. That lady died the next day and other drivers were also injured.
The moral to this story is..."accidents happen" they happen every day, to real people and to celebrities. We all need to be aware of our surroundings, esp when driving.
I feel bad for Brandy, and, of course, the other drivers.
2007-02-22 02:53:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Munya Says: DUH! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Brandy was in a multiple car collision and a lady in another car died.
2007-02-22 02:52:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
she was involved in a car accident that did kill someone. she is now being sued by the family members because of it and might even go to jail.
2007-02-22 02:52:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah it was a fender bender...it was a chain reaction to...1 woman died...Brandy could be charged with Vehicular Manslaughter...
2007-02-22 02:52:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by ~J*me~ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, she ran into a woman on the road (I think it was a traffic jam and she was speeding) and it was a pretty bad wreck. The woman died as a result (I don't remember specifics, but yes it's true).
2007-02-22 02:58:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by blue_cow27 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes she did and is being sued by the man's family. Why is she not in jail for vehicular manslaugter?
2007-02-22 02:52:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋