Assume b, d > 0, and assume (a/b) < (c/d).
{We want to prove that (a/b) < (a + c)/(b + d) < (c/d). }
Since (a/b) < (c/d), if we multiply both sides by bd (Note: this shouldn't change the inequality sign, since b > 0 and d > 0), we obtain
ad < bc
Adding ab to both sides,
ab + ad < ab + bc
Factoring both sides,
a(b + d) < b(a + c)
Dividing both sides by b(b + d) gives us
a/b < (a + c)/(b + d) {Part I of proof done}
As already stated,
ad < bc
Adding cd to both sides, we obtain
ad + cd < bc + cd
Factoring both sides,
d(a + c) < c(b + d)
Dividing both sides by d(b + d), we get
(a + c)/(b + d) < c/d {Part II of proof done}
Combining parts I and II, since
(a/b) < (a + c)/(b + d)
AND
(a + c)/(b + d) < c/d
then these two inequalities mean
(a/b) < (a + c)/(b + d) < (c/d)
2007-02-22 03:05:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Puggy 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Note that you can write:
(a+c)/(b+d) = [(a/b)(1/d) + (c/d)(1/b)]/[(1/d) + (1/b)], upon dividing top and bottom by bd.
So the fraction in the middle is just a weighted average of (a/b) and (c/d), and since the weights (1/d and 1/b) are positive, this average must lie strictly between a/b and c/d.
2007-02-22 17:55:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sumudu F 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Proof by contradiction - suppose
a/b >= (a+c)/(b+d) - denominators are positive, so cross-multiply:
â a(b+d) >= b(a+c)
â ab+ad >= ab+bc
â ad >= bc
â a/b >= c/d. Contradiction.
Similarly for the right-hand inequality.
2007-02-22 10:59:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋