2007-02-22 01:25:42 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Anybody who says that India was not a nation needs a good book on the history of the subcontinental India.
2007-02-22 12:48:07 · answer #1 · answered by Smart Indian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
INDIA WAS NOT A NATION BECAUSE BEFORE BRITISH RULE INDIA WAS DIVIDED INTO SMALL INDEPENDENT STATES WHICH WERE FIGHTING EACH OTHER AND WERE NOT UNITED AND DO NOT HAVE ANY ANY COMMON NEEDS,ASPIRATION, GOVERNMENT.BECAUSE IN A NATION PEOPLE SHARE COMMON ASPIRATIONS,NEEDS AND HAVE SAME GOVERNMENT. AFTER THE BRITISH HAD DONE WRONG TO PEOPLE OF INDIA THERE WAS ONLY A COMMON PROBLEM TO INDIA THAT WAS BRITISH THAT,S WHY THEY GET UNITED AND LATER ON FORM A NATION i.e INDIA.
2007-02-22 09:48:56 · answer #2 · answered by AaSHEK 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not only India but many nations were spread over as small areas under the control of local chiefs.as the small chiefs enjoyed getting control over more and more territories wars started and each group went on its own plans of aggressions.many nations fought in many ways to have their own rule but only few succeeded and India is a major country.at the time of freedom struggle all the rulers gave consent to form one country and thus after independence INDIA became one nation
2007-02-22 09:38:05 · answer #3 · answered by chiratai 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We realised that we are a nation and not a set of few individuals only after we were ruled by britshers
2007-02-22 22:07:47 · answer #4 · answered by Jyoti D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because as Ghandi himself India was a land of villages 1000 villages
2007-02-22 09:34:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think they were better developed and must had the vision that we are all living in the same planet. So why be separeted by nations?
2007-02-22 09:34:23 · answer #6 · answered by Entenda a História 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
india ruled by lacal kings and british fox brain used them quareling to get rulings.
2007-02-22 11:39:48 · answer #7 · answered by keral 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋