2007-02-22 01:22:08 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Explosives aplenty. The head of the world's leading building collapser even says so.
2007-02-22 01:24:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
About as much as there is logic and commonsense in all the 50+ different conspiracy theories put together - NONE
One of the most powerful explosive devices is known as FAE - Fuel Air Explosive. When these were used in the first Gulf War one BLU-82 FAE bomb weighing 15,000 lb killed everything within a 4-mile radius and troops 50 miles away thought an atomic bomb had been used. FAE works by igniting a vapour of fuel - just as would be caused when an airliner's fuel tanks are ruptured when it flies into a building. The aircraft themselves provided more than enough "explosive" to bring down a building and rumours of additional explosives being planted there are based entirely on ignorance or malice.
2007-02-22 01:24:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Actually, there wasn't any explosive in the Twin Towers. They were brought down by the impact of the jets and the ensuing fire, which was fed by jet fuel.
2007-02-22 01:25:32 · answer #3 · answered by Kiffin # 1 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋
None.. the world knows for a fact it was 2 jet aircraft that destroyed the towers. And fire caused the steel beams to weaken and evenually collapse. Are you just being stupid?
2007-02-22 01:37:57 · answer #4 · answered by gregory_usa83 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
well what really hurt the twin towers was all the jet fuel in the airplanes. Combined with the weakness of the archtecture itself
2007-02-22 01:24:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
There were no explosives; the explosions were caused by the jet fuel in the airlines that crashed into them.
2007-02-22 01:25:44 · answer #6 · answered by Enchanted 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Two big planes worth of fuel. That is a lot. And no, no one set explosives. Only an idiot would believe such garbage.
2007-02-22 01:25:31 · answer #7 · answered by celticwarrior7758 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
That depends if you believe the conspiracy theory that the twin towers were blown up
2007-02-22 01:25:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'd say zero, unless you consider gas-powered furnaces explosives. Quit looking for loose change.
2007-02-22 01:24:30 · answer #9 · answered by togashiyokuni2001 6 · 8⤊ 1⤋
i dont think there was any explosives that i heard of but Was there really a tower 7 did what that link show really happen. how come nobody knows about it.
2007-02-22 01:38:19 · answer #10 · answered by Shannyn 5 · 0⤊ 6⤋