Germany and Japan without the USA?

Question

do you think Germany and Japan would be first world countries today if the Americans didnt help rebuild those countries? i dont think so...do you..?

Answer 1

A very difficult question. When you look at East-Germany you can see what could have happend without investing in these countries. But if the USA hadn't helped rebuild Germany and Japan (and not to forget France and Great Britain as well) those countries could have fallen in the Communist orbit. This could have resulted in great difficulties for the US-economy as well.
But there is no short and easy answer to your question.

Answer 2

I don't know about Japan, but I'm sure Germany would be. The German people are overall very intelligent and the reason that they are so advanced today is because of German ingenuity and nothing else. I've been to Germany alot and am always amazed at how advanced they are and I know my uncle told me how more advanced Germany was than the US back in the 60's when he lived there. Japan on the other hand has had a lot of help by the US, not to say the Japanese aren't intelligent people. I think that the reason Japan became such a successful technology producer in the 70's and 80's was partly because of the help that the US provided. Now, it looks like Japan is slipping and China is surpassing it in nearly everything.

Vietnam- not so sure, it wasn't us bombing them that made them not become technologically advanced. they weren't as modern as the US even before the war, which isn't a bad thing.

Answer 3

I agree with you 100%. Had we (americans) not rebuilt those countries, we wouldn't have such a huge government debt. Balance the budget? I think not, ever. Maybe if Japan and Germany started paying back the equivalent of the money that was spent rebuilding...............

Answer 4

without U.S. help, there remains a reliable hazard they could have overwhelmed Nazi Germany in a one-on-one conflict. in spite of the undeniable fact that, without the Lend-hire materials, it could have taken them lots longer and the U.S. could have been devastated much extra. Germany could have more suitable farther than it did, yet in all hazard never could have reached the huge commercial complexes that Stalin moved to the Urals. as lengthy by means of fact the Soviets held them, they nevertheless could have finally defeated Germany, whether they misplaced Moscow and Stalingrad. If Japan had attacked the U.S. in 1941 or 1942, whilst the Nazis have been deep in Soviet territory, the Soviets could desire to no longer have held off the two them and the Germans without distant places help. The Soviet victory contained in the conflict of Moscow in 1941-40 two became made achievable by using the actual undeniable fact that Japan had saved to its peace settlement with the Soviets. Stalin pulled one million-reliable military off that front and gave it to Zhukov, who used it topersistent the Germans faraway from the Soviet capital. without that military, the Germans could have did no longer take Moscow in December of '40-one besides, yet could have been waiting to maintain their place some miles from it, and in all hazard could have taken the city someday in 1942. whilst the Soviets defeated Japan in 1945, it became after Germany had already surrendered. The circumstances have been thoroughly distinctive than those of 1942. The Soviet Union became in grave peril for extra suitable than a year after Operation Barbarossa started, and additionally you will't keep on with the fulfillment of the Soviet militia and munitions industry of 1945 or 1950 to the realities of 1941-40 two.

Answer 5

I dont think Germany would be I think maybe Europe as a whole but not Germany alone. Its to small for being "world power". I also think Russia would be as well, but I think it still is one of the first countrys.

Answer 6

Do you think vietnam could have been if we hadn't bombed them into the stone age? I think so.

Answer 7

Yes, they would.