Then it means Liberalism has been bombed to Hell.
2007-02-22 00:36:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by United States 2
·
2⤊
11⤋
I will not subscribe to the idea that bin Laden is dead. Not from kidney issues, that's for sure. And there was nothing else wrong with the man.
People seem to forget, before he was an extremist he was a graduate of a business college and he speaks a broken dialect of English. Then when he turned out to be an Islam extremest, his parents denounced him, threw him out of the family. So, this thing of everyone saying that Bush was protecting the parents was true, but they were flown out by the military to keep Americans from killing them. That would be the same as protective custody for witnesses to a federal crime.
Did anyone ever think about doing an artist conception of what bin Laden would look like without a beard, mustache and short hair with a new doo; and without that silly turban? Seems all criminals are put through the Faces software to get them aged 5 years and this stuff done, but not the MOST WANTED Criminal in US History? C'mon. Where's the *alls of all the guys that know the software or can draw. No attempts to change his looks? The man isn't stupid, you know? He could be hiding in plane sight, just like those two boys who were kidnapped...plain sight one for 4 years. So, it can be done and no one would be the wiser.
2007-02-22 01:44:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by chole_24 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The real question is why is George Bush afraid to admit it ? I find it hard to believe that Bush killed Bin Laden and hasn't said anything about it.
2007-02-22 01:04:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Count Acumen 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
The realistic question is "Why is the Bush administration afraid to admit Bin Laden died of natural causes?"
2007-02-22 00:44:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by American Spirit 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
The only people Bush has killed are 3000+ American troops and Iraqi's (all people who had nothing to do with 9/11). If he had killed OBL he would have bragged about it by now to bring his plummeting approval rating up. BTW, show us some proof of this fact. I am not afraid to admit anything, I just wont admit to something that isn't true.
2007-02-22 01:00:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
i have read reports of bin ladens death,nothing about bush or US forces killing him though and there is no proof of his death. not a lib thing even the bush administration and the FBI won't admit he is dead.
2007-02-22 00:55:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by b 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
If bush had killed Bin Laden, we would never hear the end of it!
2007-02-22 00:44:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
If bin laden has passed it is from natural causes and not Bush .The man has spent years fighting communists for America and all he got was the same thing america's wounded soldiers got . An at a boy and a rat invested hole to live in .
2007-02-22 00:40:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by -----JAFO---- 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
Because there's been no evidence that he's done that. It's not fear. I just want proof. If he is dead then I would want to know why the American people weren't informed when it happened. 9/11 was an attack on the entire united states, not just New York and Washington. We have a right to know if the man who orchestrated the attacks has been dealt with, one way or another.
2007-02-22 00:48:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Nope. i do no longer care if Bin weighted down's lower back replaced into grew to become and he replaced into gazing the royal wedding ceremony on television. Blast his head off. each and all of the extra effectual for the country to have him lifeless then the mess that could start up on what to do with him alive.
2016-10-16 05:55:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if it IS the case..which i doubt..the only reason can be that even they need a state of fear in the world to keep on dictating world politics..coz the writing is on the wall that they are gonna be in power after Bush goes..
2007-02-22 00:42:39
·
answer #11
·
answered by aryan_anshul123 1
·
1⤊
0⤋