also which is better RAW, SMACKDOWN or (crappy)ECW?
2007-02-22 00:30:29 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
and also TNA Impact
2007-02-22 00:32:21 · update #1
WWE Is Better
2007-02-22 00:53:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
PPV: after all I heard, I would say TNA totally
Storyline: Ummm, I'd say Raw
Wrestling: TNA has better matches, but the lack of long ones recently would make me say a tie between Smackdown and TNA....but the WWE has a lot of repetitive matches, same wrestlers fighting each other.
Talent: TNA of course, locker room is filled with them
Big Name Stars: Raw, duh!
Tag Team: WSX, well they probrobly more teams than the WWE and TNA combined right now.
Divas/Knock-outs: None, to tell you the truth the E and TNA has not used them that much at all, they seemed to be ignored.
Hardcore: WSX, so far....they have FMW style death traps, so yeah =P
So overall, I say TNA kinda wins, by a small margin.
2007-02-22 03:13:24 · answer #2 · answered by HayabusaXGrey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a wwe fan, but probably TNA is better now, since all the good wwe wrestlers are going there.. I mean I still love wwe but lets face it: WWE roster is begining to suck a lil bit. (thank you Vince)
About raw, smackdown or ecw, I stay with smackdown. sweet Ashley, Taker, London and Kendrick, Benoit, Kane, Mysterio (I guess) dunno I like the roster better I think..Great wrestlers But don't say that ECW is crappy. That is NOT true. Its still extremme. "Extreme" doesn't always mean "Hardcore" Remember great non-hardcore wrestlers that made a huge impact on ECW, like Tajiri and Super Crazy. I still like ECW, but smackdown is better. Raw.... Dunno, a lil boring. (can't stand Cena, can't stand Umaga, can't stand Kenny. Flair, you're great, Nature Boy is great, but its about time you retire, getting old. Leave wwe with your name intact, I want to see you as a Hall of Famer, but not in the ring anymore!!)
2007-02-22 07:53:30 · answer #3 · answered by BTII 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As far as talent and storylines it goes like this.
RAW - Best Talent, most storylines - 5 Stars
Smackdown - Good up and coming talent, storylines could use improvement - 3 1/2 stars
TNA - A few good talented wrestlers, a bunch of WWE throw aways but the biggest problem with them is thier lack of storylines you can follow. - 3 Stars
ECW - Extremely Crappy Wrestling. 1 or 2 good wrestlers, but most of these guys don't have the athletic talent or the creativity for thier storylines, when there are actually storylines in ECW. - 1/2 star
2007-02-22 00:50:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1st WWE RAW 2nd WWE SmackDown 3rd ECW and Last TNA
2007-02-22 00:59:52 · answer #5 · answered by >>HaRdY BoYz<< (EAW) 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are all different......raw is probably the best....smackdown is cool mostly because kane and taker are there. TNA AND ECW are pretty much in the same boat in that they usually have the rejects or the very new green talent.......but each brand serves it's purpose and should not be discredited.
2007-02-22 02:10:37 · answer #6 · answered by paul p 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I guess if you're more of a wrestling purist you will like TNA better...WWE is more storyline driven. I'm a WWE fan but I don't hate on TNA. Of the three brands, RAW is the best.
2007-02-22 01:13:29 · answer #7 · answered by RichMac82 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I watch both and I like both but, WWE is better. RAW,SMACKDOWN,ECW for me RAW is better #1, #2 is SMACKDOWN and #3 ECW I just watch ECW cuz I like to see RVD. I also like see their matches.
2007-02-22 00:38:07 · answer #8 · answered by Yesenia N 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE uncooked and Smackdown get extra ideal rankings than TNA effect!....WWE has been around longer than TNA and makes lots extra money. WWE stay activities and pay in line with perspectives have 1000's of extra human beings interior the objective audience. occasion: Wrestlemania 25 attendance - seventy two,744 TNA Slammiversary 2009 attendance - 4,000. So with the aid of records attitude WWE is a lot extra ideal. My opinion... WWE is extra ideal via fact they have 2 substantial manufacturers. this permits extra superstars to get extra in ring action additionally it motives an engaging draft each year additionally WWE diva means is extra ideal than the TNA knockout means yet TNA knockouts have lots extra ideal suits. additionally I hate WWEs PG score wrestling isn't meant to be PG. The superstars of WWE are far extra ideal than TNA superstars. They positioned on extra ideal suits too.
2016-11-24 23:38:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE because its better known but TNA has some cool wrestlers like AJ Styles. RAW is better because it has better wrestlers than the rest.
2007-02-22 03:11:04 · answer #10 · answered by IBV 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE is much better then TNA and smackdown is the best brand in WWE.ECW is the crappist
2007-02-22 03:05:13 · answer #11 · answered by timothy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋