English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For security wont this be a logistical nightmare?

2007-02-21 23:34:32 · 7 answers · asked by ǝuoʎʞɔɐʍ 7 in News & Events Media & Journalism

7 answers

No I don't.

1. By going to Iraq he is signifying support of the illegal invasion that was prompted by false intelligence and has lead to chaos and civil war.

2.As a `Royal' son of Dianna he should as his mother did- oppose war- and seek ways to help those affected by wars. His mother worked hard for international legislation banning land mines.

3. He is a danger to his unit. The press calls him a bullet magnet. If Osama Bin Laden hasn't had his troops in Iraq- he might send them in for the sole purpose of killing Harry. That would be huge for them- needless to say many others would loose their lief around him if attempts are made.

4. There is no two ways about this -killing people is bad for ones psyche. Being in a war zone- Harry might have to make fast decisions that may cost innocent people their lives

As Albert Camus said- People should strive to be neither victim nor executioner. By going to Iraq Harry is putting himself to being both.

5. It is honourable that Harry does not want to be treated differently than other men his age because of his birth. He doesn't want all of the privileges. But being who he is he has to take responsibility not just for his 12 man unit but for all the men and as Tony Blair is trying to wind down England's participation, and also loss of English soldiers lives- Harry is positioning himself to be in the very wrong place at the wrong time, sending the wrong message.

Paul Grant (follower of basho)

2007-02-24 13:20:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Im no longer a member of the army even nonetheless I definitely have spent just about 30 months working in iraq and that i've got those days back via upward thrust in bombings upon the british bases. area of me has a similar opinion that Prince Harry could flow to Iraq to develop morale for the troops that are already there. even nonetheless I do agree that there'll be a upward thrust at risk no longer basically to himself yet for fellow troops around him and additionally the army bases. Why does our u . s . a . could broadcast each little thing that the Princes do? If our u . s . a . only sent him obtainable and have been given his excursion over and finished with then i've got faith that the risk enhance would not be as large because it rather is now. i might prefer to choose Prince Harry a secure excursion alongside with something of the British troops and each and all of the civilian workers that are presently working in Iraq.

2016-11-24 23:35:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I dont think he will go because England is going to pull out of Iraq

2007-02-21 23:38:04 · answer #3 · answered by mojo09226 2 · 0 0

No doubt, but why should he be exempt?

2007-02-22 02:31:30 · answer #4 · answered by juicie813 5 · 0 0

I hope he gets shot up the ar!!se.

2007-02-21 23:41:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think its great that he is going....

2007-02-22 00:20:34 · answer #6 · answered by Grogan 5 · 0 0

If he wants to.

2007-02-21 23:38:07 · answer #7 · answered by Dr Dee 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers