I'ts quite obvious since E.T. paid Howard Stern for exclusive interviews that they are taking Howard's side no matter what, do you think this show has gone too far?
2007-02-21 23:29:22 · 4 answers · asked by julia4evert 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
"ET" used to be a guilty pleasure of mine until they forked over more than $1 million to Mary Kay Letourneau for exclusive coverage of her wedding to her former high school student/lover.
The show has only gotten worse since then.
It's pure tabloid trash, and should definitely be avoided.
2007-02-21 23:55:12 · answer #1 · answered by m.allen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
E.T. is an entertainment show, not an information show. Much like Star magazine is totally different than Time magazine. And if Howard Stern is really the father-which I'm not saying he is-then why not take his side? True something is fishy about two people close to him dying in similar ways, but maybe it was the Mother! Just kidding, I wish everything would finally be resolve, the poor girl didn't have peace in her life and now her body can't even be laid to rest in a peaceful manor. What is wrong with America?
2007-02-22 08:33:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ET will report any garbage they get their hands on whether it's true or not. THey're not the only ones.
All the people involved in this "where should Anna be buried"" saga have no credibility. In my opinion the Judge is turning this into a sitcom. He's got an attitude. He calls Anna's mother, MaMa - calls AnnaNiccole "the baby". What a jerk. And none of what's being talked about has anything to do with where ANicole should be buried. It should be next of kin who determines it....and the Judge knows this. But they're talking about how she died, drugs, and who's the father, etc.
2007-02-22 08:27:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dunno,I'll have to watch it first.
2007-02-22 07:37:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋