It is not in their best interests to do anything to hurt the USA. We could wipe them from the map no matter how devestating their attack on us would be. They have to know this. It would be completely insane and completely suicidal to ever attack us with nuclear weapons.
So why then, is Bush making such a big deal out of Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology as a fuel for electricity?
Is it because this entire Iranian nuclear scare is really about pulling the Middle East, as a whole, into the European Banking System that has taken over the rest of the world? a.k.a. The Federal Reserve!
2007-02-21 22:27:42 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Great question No nation could use nuclear weapons on us or Israel without knowing a butt kicking is on the way.The United States has 13 nuclear aircraft carriers .France and China have one.In the next five years we plan to build the USN Gerald Ford. How can you spend this kind of kind of money and give tax cuts to Donald Trump and Paris Hilton.For the last three years Bush has cut spending on the war on cancer.That is a war we are winning.If I ran this nation I better find a nuclear threat to spent big bucks on. We all know how some of this money goes back to the fox placing the orders. I think I could make a donation to you for buying my jet.Maybe I could get you a job when you leave office.We need as many threats as we can find.
2007-02-21 23:07:53 · answer #1 · answered by radio309 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iran is not a nuclear threat to the United States, but it certainly is a nuclear threat to other nations in the region, especially Israel. I also think that if Iran had tactical, short-range nuclear weapons, it would be inclined to use them against US and allied forces currently operating in Afghanistan and Iraq.
For these reasons, the possession of an offensive nuclear capability by Iran is a serious destabilizing factor in the region.
Every other nation on earth that has developed nuclear technology for peaceful purposes (i.e., to produce electrical power) has allowed IAEA inspectors to inspect their program. Iran has not. Why? What does it have to hide if its program is completely peaceful?
That's why it's such a big deal.
2007-02-21 22:34:18 · answer #2 · answered by yanbarumuku 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is! We said the same think about IRAQ in 1981, when Israel alone bombarded the nuclear facilities of IRAQ there. Even the USA stopped sending the rest of the F-16 for Israel. But in the first golf war, everybody found out what they should know before. Why Iran needs nuclear weapons? Nobody threats Iran with out them! Nobody! Even Iran it self can not claim that is threatened by other countrie 's nuclear arsenals! We all know that there is no chance that USA and Israel could use nuclear weapons against Iran. So, why Iran needs them? What is going to happened to the future?
2007-02-21 22:43:10 · answer #3 · answered by filip 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Iran had other plans and was working the system so they could enrich the uranium to 'weapons grade'. Everyone that knows anything about science and nukes realizes they do not need weapons grade enrichment to run nuke power for 'just energy'.
It's only enriched that way for warheads. Besides, if everyone would get onto the whitehouse.gov web site, they could listen to the press briefings by Tony Snow..who does them like either daily or every other day.
He also said yesterday that they're getting a little tired of the press trying to write a 'war with Iran' into their media reports.
The European Union is for European nations...not the US. We have the floors above the United Nations and support that. They have absolutely 'nothing' to do with the Federal Reserve system in the US. Please check your facts.
2007-02-21 22:48:04 · answer #4 · answered by chole_24 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are not yet a nuclear threat.
This is like saying the thug who wants to kill you has not yet got a gun.
Iran has been at war with the West, and the US, since 11/4/79. They have done nothing to change that, and are currently operating inside Iraq, targeting Iraqi and coalition soldiers.
I speak of the government of Iran. Many of the people seem to be pro-US. However the Revolutionary Council disarmed any of the people who hadn't already been disarmed by the Shah, and the people therefore have no means to resist their government.
Do you really believe that with all the oil they have, they need nuclear power plants to survive?
2007-02-21 22:39:56 · answer #5 · answered by dBalcer 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What you don't understand, my friend, is the mindset of a radical Islamist, of which is Ahmadinejad and his ilk. They WANT to hurry up the return of the Immadi. To bring this about REQUIRES, in their mind, creating Apocalyptic conditions in the world. So attacking us with nuclear weapons and the subsequent response...even destruction at the hands of the US is irrelevant, because "the return" leads to the destruction of their world anyway. It also doesn't matter to the leaders whether or not their zealot vision is shared by the masses.
So, yes, I do sincerely believe that Iran is a nuclear threat.
2007-02-22 00:29:21 · answer #6 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
People heavily invested in the military industrial complex are getting impatient for war. They don't like the prospect of having to wait few years to further augment their private jet collections. If the people heavily invested in the military industrial complex had children in the military, it might be different; they wouldn’t buy politicians & media for their greeds/proxy- wars. If they are serious they should look at North Korea which is a far more dangerous country, but they will not attack it (no oil & gas, nothing interesting to be gained). Pretty sure lots of these Arab Jihadi "enemies" are on our payroll and training directly/indirectly. The honest ones who aren’t our proxies are Jihadis because we create, support the other jihadis. plus we bomb the hell out of muslim countries overthrowing their govts, creating chaos, misery and we create lots of deaths all for amurderka's master: Jewry/Israel. Must read it in the US military-weapon industry-banking industry. This complex requires war by priory. Its business and money after all. Whenever there is a flourishing war, Its said that the shares of their weapon industries goes sky high. And the whole world owe to Zionist Rothschild’s banking family more than 400 trillion US$. We all are slave to them.
2015-04-08 01:27:06 · answer #7 · answered by bangladeshi.babu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. That's not the reason. There are nuclear arms agreements in place violated by Iran now. You DO NOT want Iran or Iraq or N Korea to have nuclear bomb making permission!!
Arms agreements have been in place long before Bush was VOTED INTO OFFICE! Voted! By the Voters! He didn't take office by military coup. God. People. Educate your self before saying such inflammatory bs here!
2007-02-21 22:32:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I don't think an attack from Iran has ever really been the issue. It's the fact that they will offer up the technology or even a weapon itself to those who have nothing to lose.
2007-02-21 22:53:27 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Iran is a nuclear threat to the US. We need to vaporize their country to neutralize the threat.
Many people believed Japan would never attack Pearl Harbor
So much for your "beliefs"
2007-02-21 22:49:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋