2007-02-21 21:04:05 · 15 answers · asked by Bob M 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
I sincerely hope not.
2007-02-21 21:06:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think of that each and each united states ought to have a militia for defence, to guard its territory and on occasion to help different international locations that is attacked by potential of a despotic chief , a rival of kind, yet united statesa. is a huge power, it has a reliable military, an improve technological power, elementary English; SUPERIORITY, so the fiasco with Iran , North Korea and others must be dealt in negotiations, till one in all them assaults the united statesA. then i will justfy conflict. bombs ,under no circumstances! this cases are confusing and packed with unhappiness it kind of feels we are loosing our sence of accountability. If the united statesA. has no longer arise and performed some thing with the Lebanon disaster do you think of it is going to do something with North Korea? I dont think of so , the present administration concentration is in the middle east ,so whilst the missiles hit from the Korea it's going to be a huge sorpresa. a guy or woman who threatens like the North Korea chief potential it and finally does it.
2016-10-16 05:46:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Against Iran, possibly yes, my Sunday rag said they'd be ready to strike by spring. against N Korea, no. A deal has been done there thanks to the Chinese - and the US wouldn't strike against a country that actually has nukes (Iran hasn't yet, still 5 or so years away to actually having weapons)
2007-02-21 21:35:49 · answer #3 · answered by Dr Watson (UK) 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Agreed, US won't do anything against N Korea. Probably Iran but it won't be a lesser war.
2007-02-22 18:43:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope not. But as is so often the case the people who are most in favour of war are rarely in the front line themselves. Perhaps we should make it a mandatory requirement of those who wave the flag at home, in both of our countries, to be in the front line of the battles they call for.
2007-02-22 01:57:33 · answer #5 · answered by JOHN D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, not as long as the liberals have control of both Houses of Congress.
Thanks to those left-wing idiots, we are now perceived as a country of wimps that can be easily pushed around.
2007-02-21 21:17:48 · answer #6 · answered by GeneL 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I hope so. Unfortunately the bleeding hearts tie the hands of the country from righting the wrongs. When its too late then the entire country will wake up and stupidly say "what went wrong?!"
2007-02-21 21:14:39 · answer #7 · answered by cellguy38019 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋
North Korea doesn't have oil.
Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons.
So what will Bush do? Make the world safe? Or keep oil cheap?
2007-02-22 02:43:14 · answer #8 · answered by DanRSN 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The same people that believe in 'Global Warming' think they are, but no intelligent person does.
2007-02-21 23:24:13 · answer #9 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why doesn't the US just pull it's neck in and sort out any problems it has at home and stop trying to rule everybody else.
Who says their way is right,j
2007-02-22 13:39:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
if they got the arms, they got the arms.I am not sure though if they will really go for the full strike.... time will tell, not sure when...
2007-02-22 10:48:45 · answer #11 · answered by charnelhouse 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋