I think Hillary is the classic black-suit, army boots wearin, man-hating type of mantis, yes...
However, she deserves to have it that way. She had position of First Lady, and it became publiicly known around the WORLD that her husband probably had more than 3 affairs (that we know about), and yet, instead of crying about it, divorcing him, and leaving politics all together, she persevered, publically (just publically) forgave him, stayed by his side, and continued in politics. I for some reason find that to demonstrate MUCH more integrity and honesty than somebody who entered office by the strings of his daddies purse purse purse. Daddy George Warbucks is nice to have, but that doesn´t mean that Dubya isn´t just a spoiled little brat. What do you guys think??? I am so interested.
2007-02-21
20:38:36
·
8 answers
·
asked by
nassim420
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
If publicly winning a long struggle in front of snooty reporters and judgemental conservatives isn´t winning, then I don´t think she has to prove anything more to have my respect.
2007-02-21
20:42:17 ·
update #1
Dr. Fred, trust me, she wasn´t clueless. If you want to know one thing about women, they know when they are being cheated on. Staying by his side, showed that she had other benefits of being in the relationship and ANY Pat Robertson etc.., would do similar. Trust me, you cheat on a woman, you lose your right to complain if she takes you back. Kind of like, you assault an officer, you lose your right of them being polite to you. Just the way it is.
2007-02-21
20:51:18 ·
update #2
And to docbuns, you can think that, it is fine. That is your opinion and that was mine. Look people, two people happened to disagree about something, but kept it civil. Somebody to learn from, eh?? Seriously, that was the most considerate answer. Thank you.
Love and Respect.
2007-02-21
21:03:31 ·
update #3