If people would just stop watching trash TV and buying mags like People and InTouch all of this crap would end. I'm hoping that city governments would ban "phototogs" from jumping out in traffic and being terrorists.
Britney Spears is a nutcase, who probably is overwhelmed by fame and fortune. She needs to lock herself in a mansion with high walls and not come out for a couple of years. Let her children play with her and ditch the Hollywood lifestyle. She has little ones to think about now....
2007-02-21 19:19:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by therazorsx 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes the press should leave her and every other celebrity on the planet alone after all everyone has a right to a private life... Just like nobody likes others pokin noses in their bussinesses it should be the same with the celebrities....
anyways you cant completely blame the media for all this.. they cater to us, the public, we want to know, they tell us..
the general public is the one that is way too much interested in what goes on in their lives....
you should think about that too...
2007-02-22 03:23:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by sui generis 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No absolutely not. She wanted fame and fortune yet she didnt want the darkside of it. She also decideed to walk on that darkside of life and now she claims she's cracking? Look so she has kids so did Ma Barker. You mess with the bull you get the horns. There are other celebrities that dont indulge in the excesses of life. As the movie line says "I dont blame people for their mistake but I expect them to pay for them". If Britney didnt want all this negative attention she wouldnt do negative things
2007-02-22 04:01:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by gerbil31603 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is the problem in Hollywood. There is no PRIVATE words if you become celebrity or politican in America. But for me, Britney is a human like us & the press should give her a space to breathe. She can kill herself if she is really tension. I'm not her fan but what can I say, I'm really think press already cross the line
2007-02-22 04:30:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by lazuardi.sepi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, we, the people, as a whole need to quit salivating over every little tidbit of dirt uncovered about Britney (or Paris, TomKat, Nicole, or whoever)...then the press would not feel compelled to shove celeb dird down our throats.
Which reminds me of a joke....
Interviewer: So tell us, J. Lo, who is the best guy you've ever had?
J. Lo: AFF-leck!!
(You know, like the duck in the commercial....OK, it's much better hearing it that reading it.)
2007-02-22 03:20:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yinzer Power 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I started this boycott a long time ago simply because I'm not interested in the lives of people I don't know. But there are others who want to know about it, otherwise the media wouldn't cover it.
2007-02-22 03:22:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Deep Thought 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the world should leave her alone. She isn't a popstar anymore. She isn't talented anymore (well, not the way she used to be). She is a has been (and that's coming from someone who used to be a fan of hers). So yes, everyone should leave her alone. But i do congratulate her on her leaving that joke of a human being K-Fed.
2007-02-22 03:24:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Alex, I think that thought is really sweet of you. It lets me know you are very compassionate. Unfortunately, in the media they show no mercy. Any icon in the world today is subject to this love hate relationship the people and media have for our stars. Does this help a little bit? I think that was very considerate on your part though and you are an angle in my book.
2007-02-22 03:20:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by 5-Stars 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Give the Pool Girl a Break
2007-02-22 04:45:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by uksawatdii 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. She wanted the fame and fortune. When you become a celebrity, you don't have a private life. Some are more famous than others but I think that's the price you pay to become famous.
2007-02-22 06:54:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋