DEFINETELY KAMAL HASSAN, HE IS ACTOR'S ACTOR. NO PERSON IN INDIAN CINEMA FIELD PLAYED SUCH DIVERSE ROLES AS PLAYED BY KAMAL.
2007-02-21 19:07:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by nightingale 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kamal Hassan
2007-02-21 20:02:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by AbuSaleh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a good question because today not many would know much about Sivaji Ganesan whereas many know about Kamal Hassan so naturally many in this forum would say it is Kamal who is better but to tell the truth it is Sivaji because best actor means a person who expresses himself or does a role play to the perfection. As somebody in the forum already stated kamal has done many a diversified actions to capture the hearts of the millions but one thing you should see what is the average reality of the each role he has played . In the case of sivaji almost all the roles he played looked as if they are all real. He as a police officer in thanga padakam, His role as a brahmin officer in Vietnam Veedu and almost each and every film he acted no he lived in that role. He acted all this only for his livelyhood as an actor and not to compete or excel any other actor. He had no target or gole in his acting. It was only a duty and to perform it to 100% perfection was his motto. In the case of Kamal he has sivaji as his goal , his target , his achievement . You can even today hear from him that sivaji is his most adored actor and nobody can beat him as the best actor. Hence friend not only Kamal Hassan , even raj kapoor, shammi kapoor, or Charles bronson, or Gegory Peck or Omar Sheriff why nobody " Na Bhootho Na Bhavishathi" meaning never before or never in the future we could find any other person who can act like shivaji or beat him in action.
2007-02-21 19:53:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ssmindia 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Both of them are really great but the real credit goes to kamal hassan when it comes to dedicating life for cinema and doing anything for cinema. He is the one person i can find in the taml industry clubbing imagination, thoughts, message and technology in the right proportion but unfortunately his movies like heyram, anbe sivm and recently mumbai exp. have not become box office hits...and he regrets that very much and i too along with him. Such a dedicated personality who wants to take the tamil cinema to the next level with all the measures he can try is the best one and all the same sivaji is indeed a best actor and only best actor but kamal in his language is sagalakalaa vallavan.
2007-02-21 23:20:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by mays 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
both are good actors.but sivaji is an actor from the drama,and he didnt quite get the acting skills according to the medium of cinema.
so i would say kamal hassan is better than sivaji.and kamal understands the medium well.so naturally its Kamal hassan.
2007-02-22 20:33:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by kamal_anjelo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kamal Hassan is best of actor
2007-02-21 22:02:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both cannot be compared. Shivaji is the best NATURAL actor while Kamal Hassan is a sincere worker concentrating in all aspects. You have to see period of their bloom. During the Shivaji period, the technology has not developed this much.
By the by do not concentrate only on films and actors. We have other things also to learn.
2007-02-21 19:28:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by RAGHAVAN N 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
which eye is better ? had kamal entered the film world about 60 yrs back,
he would have acted in a more melodramatic way[since it was prefered then]
and had sivaji's entry was only about 30 yrs back, he would have depicted
his roles in a more realistic way. However, all said and done, they are actors
par excellence..
2007-02-25 16:12:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by orveeor 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
most of the present era could understand the background. in case you deeply notice Sivaji's function in politics, he confronted defeat purely in elections. in fact it replaced into his presence that helped MGR stooped to potential. In 1977 parliament eleections, the congress aligned with AIADMK, via which Sivaji Ganesan canvassed for MGR. This helped the alliance potential provided that seeing MGR-Sivaji at the same time on diploma replaced into an fairly huge morale booster for the persons. the comparable got here approximately in 1984 and 1987. purely in 1980 MGR could seize potential on his very own. That too replaced into the consequences of probably non-cooperation between the two alliance companions opposite AIADMK. Sivaji Ganesan replaced into very sparkling approximately his occupation and politics. He did not enable politics to interfer in his occupation. a lot of his co-stars incl. S.A. Asokan, Thengai Srinivasan, etc. have been in the choice camp and nevertheless could act in his video clips. in assessment to MGR, he accompanied a nationalist occasion and it replaced into that occasion's failure, which didn't use him or his rank and record, particularly aligned with one interior of reach occasion or the different. Even in 1989, he canvassed for one faction of AIADMK and not for him. In his political occupation he under no circumstances sought potential or votes for his very own self for my section. while it quite is the case how can or not it quite is taken care of as political failure? it could purely be an electoral failure it quite is undemanding for all events.
2016-12-17 16:00:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
kamal hassan
2007-02-21 19:41:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by rose 2
·
0⤊
0⤋