We're not fighting Iraq?

Question

We're fighting Islamic people? that are radical?
wait so...
the reason we are in Iraq is to get rid of the Islamic terrorists? and terrorists in general? and al-Queda?

Answer 1

Confusing, isn't it? That's becaused the war is a lie. The war is all about the "Big Picture". The tribal people of the Middle East had not risen above their neolithic differences to align and form a lasting union of tolerance among themselves, as other nations of the world already had, when greedy foreigners descended upon those lands and began to plunder the oil there. Royalty and tribal elites were bribed. And, the CIA was used by U.S. oil interests, including those belonging to the Bush family, to deliberately destabilize the region for control and to prevent the people in the Middle East from uniting and controlling the oil themselves. Halliburton had the contracts to build the Al Qaeda training camps. Our new Secretary of Defence, Gates, was the man assigned to "build-up" and teach the Al Qaeda forces how to fight, to use them against the Soviets and we continued to use Al Qaeda up until 1999, I believe, in Bosnia. Bush's oil company, Arbusto, is business partners with the Bin Laden family and, as a gesture of friendship, Bush gave Osama's brother, Salem, the Houston Gulf Airport in Texas. Bush and his family and his associates significantly helped to create the terrorists that our soldiers fight today. And, they deliberately contributed to the chaos and suffering of innocent people there. The people of the Middle East, betrayed by their corrupted leaders and weakened by such foreign powers, failed to rise to the realities of the 20th century in time for the 21st. And, their future is grim. Middle Eastern oil production peaks in 2012 and ends in 2070. The plunder of Middle Eastern oil is now a desparate piggy-fest of who gets control of the remaining oil there. The societies there, so long destabilized, have disintegrated into episodic chaos and heightened religiosity as the quality of leadership plummeted. Foreign and local elite oil interests, concerned about security for their pipelines and oil fields now that factions of local power mongers, freedom fighters and religious fanatics threaten to disrupt the efficient flow of oil out of the land, placed foreign troops, including those from UK and U.S., in the region to ensure enough, but only just enough, stability to get the oil out. Many U.S. soldiers there now report that all they do is guard oil fields and a flow of oil profits that go to only a few people in the world. Even the plunder has grown chaotic with an estimated 500,000 barrels of oil going "missing" every day, securing someone's power in the future as oil begins to run out. $20 Billion U.S. taxpayer money that Bush sent in cash with his man Bremer was "lost" there recently. Not until Democrats raised a fuss did an investigation start and some of the Billions are supposedly accounted for. Bush marches through the region and wants to invade Iran now to lock up the pipeline routes. He is telling U.S. taxpayers that he must have $622 BILLION more! He has not said what he wants that money for, though. And, he refuses to state his "plan" for Iraq. He just says he has one. In order to have an initial foothold for the plunder march through the region, the U.S. pays Israel $30,000 every year bribe for every man, woman and child, plus, has given them weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons which the Isrealis have recently threatened (then denied) to use against the Iranians. Those are the only WMD known in the region aften ten years of searching for more. The search for WMD is a propaganda ploy to convince easily frightened U.S. taxpayers to keep supporting the "search". It is a ploy because arms dealers and their activities are well known by U.S. intelligence. Now, with a Democratic Congress and worldwide disgust for Bush and Cheney's lying and plundering and unspeakably irresponsible plundering of our own nation's financial security while racking up the largest national debt in the history of mankind, there may be some reasonable approach that will be considered and some way to help the people of those regions who have been disarmed and are now at the mercy of roving gangs of religious fanatics and other factions. Bush stated during the Presidental debates that "there would be NO nation building" there, though. Recently, I heard on the news that Iran tried in 2003 to align with the U.S. against the Taliban. But, Bush refused to meet with them. He has no intentions whatsoever of promoting democracy ANYWHERE, unless it submits to his plans. Bush has no respect for democracy in the U.S., either. He refuses to listen to the will of the American people or to our Congress and insinuates that anyone who disagrees with him is allied with "terrorists". He's a pig for saying that, by the way. Just today, Cheney said that Democrats and the Speaker of the House of the United States of America are "validating the Al Qaeda strategy", by opposing Bush's troop build-up. He's a pig, too, for saying that. Bush does not represent the American people. He represents the oil interests and war profiteers. He and his gang have done nothing but destabilize and weaken the United States. Bush has aligned himself and his interests in the U.S. with the Christian Evangelicals, 40 million strong, whose leadership reported last fall in "Faith and Nation" that they advocate for the violent overthrow of the U.S. government if their religious agenda is not made into legislation. And, they are preparing to fight their neighbors. Bush is contributing to the creation of even more terrorists in these Evangelical fanatics. Bush and his family supported Saddam when it suited them. They support whomever goes along with them or is most easily bribed with U.S. taxpayers' money. Bush supports the Shiites now because they seem the most easily "managed" and exploitable or amenable to the "Big Picture". That may change from day to day, depending upon the vagaries of the chaos. Bush hails from a family with a history for supporting terrorists. Bush's grandfather, Prescott, supplied at least one/third of Hitler's raw materials before President Rooselvelt and the U.S. Congress stopped him specifically with the Trading with the Enemy Act. Bush fully intends to invade Iran for profit. Someone called him the great "delusionist". The so-called weapons that were found there recently and that Bush states are the reason for invading a nation are consider "highly suspicious" even by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Don't be confused. Be VERY angry.

Answer 2

As far as I understand it we went into Iraq due to there having Weapons of Mass Destruction and to remove the Dictator Saddam Hussain. We are currently involved within Iraq in an attempt to introduce some form of democracy and to build an infrastructure to provide stability and protection for the people of Iraq. Any other motives have not been proven or disproven to exist (No one in power has stated that we invaded for oil) although it would only be sensible to state that no Weapons of Mass Destuction have been found despite that being the reason the UK government used to justify the invasion.
The invasion of Afganistan was to hunt down and capture or kill Osama Bin Laden and othe members of the Al Qaeda terrorist organisation whom it was believed the Taliban rulers were sheltering.
In general we are in Iraq because we believe that Saddam Hussain was a brutal dictator who may have had WMD's and we are in Afganistan as part of the "war on terror" or at least thats what i think happened. ;-)

Answer 3

Right. We are not. And whether or not a war happens in someone else's home town (yours?) is entirely washable at 60 degrees. I believe you, totally. Good on you. Well done, you competent savage!

I suppose you can't show & tell how you did that, though? Did you bring a digital video camera? Did some expert steal your chip? How many Iraqis did you kill this week? And, out of sheer curiosity, how did that person's permanent death transform and or enrich your life? To a life worth living?

I would like to see how you differentiate between dead terrorists and the other dead people? Is there some formula for separating the quick from the defeated loser terrrorists? Do you hire women to dress the failures in black? Do they receive time-and-a-half? Do you think it's well worth it to have been flown there at your nation's expense, and be here now? What's wrong with them, anyway?

Answer 4

I think you forgot the declared reason for fighting Iraq which -if I`m not mistaken -was searching for nuclear weapons. Don`t forget that you pushed Saddam to fight Iran.US suppoted the Afghanis against Russia. Now Afghanistan and Iraq are terrorists ?Just be fair to answer the following : How many did you kill in Hiroshima ?How many did you kill in Iraq ? How many did you kill in Afganistan ?How many did you kill in Veitnam ?
How many do you keep in Guntanamo ? After all , Muslims are terrorists?

Answer 5

No it's not. All is because particular interests, and they use the media to convince the people. And americans love to be convinced and very well known for being narrowminded. I recommend you read a lot of news from websites from europe or other regions outside the US, to make a good and personal opinion. US media is manipulated by personal interests. Thats the awful truth.

Answer 6

We are fighting for our National interest--the ability to have an oil supply to meet our needs. I get that. No one should be able to disagree with this fact on either side of the table. So be it. If Chimpy would have just stated this fact--he'd be President for life.

Answer 7

well we started the war because bush felt we should follow leads he knew was fake in the first place, but the leads as we know were about wmd's (weapons of mass destruction) The only reason he believed them was because well oil. he is in oil stock companies... so that is why we are in war. and who are we fighting, we are fighting the people that are rebeling that we are invading there country for oil so bush becomes richer,

but by all means we should not forget our troops that are over there. i was there and all you end up hearing is the bad stuff everyone says nothing good. so even if u dont believe in the war support our troops, its not like they want to be there either

Answer 8

Yes, we kill them there everyday, it is the fact - they are from everywhere in ME, some may be in Iraq but most of them are outside. But remember, we didn't bring any oil back here. I would love if Iraq gives us some gifts (oil) so gas price may drop!

Answer 9

You are out of it. Al Qauda are not in the militias we are fighting. They are Iraqi's, not terrorist! Show me one newspaper that call them terrorists!They, and the administration, calls them insurgents!

We are in a civil war being fought for control of the government!

Answer 10

we are in iraq to unseat a terroristic dictator, it is terrorists trying to gain a welthy foothold that have kept us there the only reason why religion is brought up is because of the medea, and the terrorists themselves

Answer 11

Good question?

-Arcade
http://truerepublican.10.forumer.com/
Take some time to sign up =D