He's got a PhD, is a successful author of numerous best-selling books, and is one of the most listened to talk show hosts on radio today. What are your thoughts?
2007-02-21 16:43:55 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Oh Yea !!! Kick those illegals goodbye. LOL Good idea.
2007-02-21 16:46:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
At least he can talk and not put listeners to sleep, and none of the wishy washy bullcrap, even if I don't agree with him. Liebermann is the answer to insomnia, Edwards I'd want to see his rabies tag first. We've already had 8 years of Hillary in the White House and as senator, and even whacked leftwing nutjobs in Hollywood aint listening to her anymore. So I'd like to see a Savage-Obama debate as long as it stayed on campaign issues and off character assaination, I think they could help each other jump out in front for their party nominations by doing that. I agree with the equal airtime for all candidates idea suggested some time ago, so that money alone didn't determine the election.
2007-02-21 16:54:08 · answer #2 · answered by theshadowknows 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Savage should run up to full speed, lower his head and collide with a cement truck. I could care less if he's a PhD, a BFD or sold more books than the Bible, he's a charlatan full of BS. It has become a small, if overpopulated, world, and every time I hear him I am terrified that anyone would give this hatemonger the time of day, let alone buy into his crap.
2007-02-21 16:58:48 · answer #3 · answered by featherstone_33 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i does no longer vote for Michael Savage for President, if he ran, often through fact he's in simple terms too emotionally volatile to be a reliable President. He might make a similar mistake that the Bush administration made up of performing too unilaterally, different than he might take this unilateralism to even extra beneficial extremes that no longer even the dogmatic Bush administration might have dared to take it. He has spent a lot of his political profession vilifying the completed left by potential of characterizing the completed left as sharing a similar philosophy and traits as people who're on the unconventional edge of the left wing stream. This predilection, by potential of Michael Savage, to portray the contest so unfairly, potential that he could be surely too damaging to cooperation, in spite of if that cooperation could be reliable for the country. Having listened to Savage, on his tutor the Savage united states, and having examine his books “The Savage united states”, “The Enemy interior of”, and “Liberalism is A psychological affliction”, i will fairly say that his very own attitude is so skewed through previous injustices he perceived he replaced into concern to, through political correctness from the left, that he might under no circumstances be a truthful Commander and chief. Any guy who believes that international family is for the susceptible, and extols the virtues of preemptive conflict shouldn’t be President of united statesa.. Any guy that believes selection has been surely deleterious to united statesa. shouldn’t be President. Any guy who believes that we've been a extra effectual united states in the Fifties than we are immediately shouldn’t be President. Any guy who glorifies the barbarity interior the previous testomony, and believes that we ought to consistently follow such barbarism to rapidly’s international shouldn’t be President. So no, i might under no circumstances vote for him.
2016-10-16 05:34:33 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Savage is a great politician in what he does, but to be honest, Romney and Giuliani present two very good conservative options for 2008 and guys like Savage are much more highly valued doing what they do now- injecting some honest conservatism in media that is so flooded by liberals.
2007-02-21 16:53:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. As of now he's thought of as too much of a "lunatic" and cannot win. He will make more money for himself and do more for educating the public by just staying on radio, which is what he will do.
2007-02-21 20:30:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Great idea. I would like him to run as a third party candidate. I might even contribute money to help him set up the third party.
I think you should get to work on this right away.
2007-02-21 16:52:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anyone on radio or tv that calls for descenting voices of government be thrown into concentration camps should be thrown off a cliff. Maybe he should run for dictator of North Korea.
2007-02-21 16:49:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Savage is perfect at doing what he is doing now. He would be depressed to even file for office.
I am glad that he is republishing one of his old health related books. I wish he'd republish all of them!
2007-02-21 16:48:34 · answer #9 · answered by Susan M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, he's way to much of an extremist. He will never, ever get the moderate vote. But hey, go ahead and encourage him to run, he'll do more harm than good to the GOP.
2007-02-21 16:57:10 · answer #10 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would definately vote for him - he's great!
He tells it like it is and that's it.
We need more people, like him, in politics then we wouldn't have the problems we have now.
Today's politicians have too many grey areas - I'd rather have it in black or white. It's like YES or NO - there are no other answers.
2007-02-21 16:54:26 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋