I am an Iranian ,Is that America government purpose is to overthrow Iranian regime or helping to prolong their

Question

power and control over Iranians? As I said I am Iranian and. I think America neocons are pretty well aware of the fact that by any kind of attacks on Iran , they would unite now pro American Iranian people to become hostile towards America and start supporting their leaders that they have fought against them with passion sometime ago . That is why my leaders are not afraid of triggering America to initiate war with Iran because they certainly know that their losted popularity will come back and that they might get a chance to prolong their dominancy over Iranians once more .
I am interested to know that if American government is that foolish that does not know what would be the consequences of an American attack on Iran would be or they just intend to break Iran apart form within by supporting terrorist insurgencies within Iran and not for weakening Iranian regime but for the wrecking Iranian unity and turning Iran to their another private only use gas station?

Songndance
I know what I am talking about ofcourse I myself support a regime chage by IRAN DO YOU REALLY THINK YOUR GOVERNMENT PERPOSE IS THAT OR AS I SAID WHAT YOUR GOVEMENT IS DOING WOULD BE TOTALLY HELP MY GOVERNEMTN TO MEAINTAIN ITS POWER OVER MY PEOPLE AND POSTPHONE DOMCARCY TO HAPPEN IN iRAN

LeAnne
Ok I redefine what I meant by being a proAmerican
By saying proAmerican I mean that my people like American culture , still it does not mean that they would like an American invasion and attack on Iran that would kill thousand of Iranians . If you were me , would still like a person who cause you pain and death of one of your family members . Besides , Iranians do not like to be invaded by any countries and one more thing is that unlike what you said democracy can not be brought to a country by using any kind of force , democracy shall be carry out by the very own people of Iran and war by increasing poverty and chaos would not be exactly help Iran to get any closer to democracy

sociald
my leaders are not afraid of an American attack does not mean they are promoting hostility with America as there is certain risks in doing it so such as the people dissatisfaction of them might lead to another people uprising before America attacks iran , another thing is that America is helping t Iranian groups within Iraq not Iran to bring Iran to a public unrest and eventually a civil war , so even though people support of regime would increase still there is serious risk that America can successfully topple Iranian regime but the thing matters that if America really want to bring peace to Middle east by supporting war . Would you really think bombing Iran would bring stability and peace to the Middle East or just would cause Public resentment toward America and increase the popularity of Mullahs?

another thing is that why Pakistan government , a government very popular for its long support of al-Quade , has the support of America but not Iran?.Saudi Arabia government is the main supporter of Iraqi Sunni insurgencies that 90 % of American troop casualties has been caused by them and yet America has not even mentioned Saudi Arabia as one of the main reasons for the Iraq chaos and unrest, the very government that also can be accused of playing a major role in 9 11 catastrophe . In addition Iran is not in civil war right now but it is like USA official are really interested to provoke one in Iran , the same as they did in Iraq. I, Usa like to support theoretic governments such as in Pakistan ,Saudi Arabia and let see in Egypt , in Africa and in Latin America or how about in Iran ?

Answer 1

Your the ones that are rattling the sabers, if you choose to shout to loud you'll see what dust to dust really means..

Answer 2

Bush has been on a mission from god. He admits that he thinks he hears god, and that god tells him what to do. The only thing saving us from him is that he is out of office soon. I don't know why the Iraqi war has finally gotten unpopular with Americans, but it's about time. If we don't watch out, we'll end up like Russia, dead broke. I don't know if we're going to have enough money to start a third war. That's why Iran may be safe from an American attack. The wealthy who run the US political parties don't really care about what is good for other countries or even what is good for Americans, they just want to make money. Hopefully, they'll find another way to make money than by making another war.

Answer 3

those are Kurdish terrorist communities no longer Iraqi terrorist communities, individuals of those communities are regularly Turkish/Iranian Kurds hiding interior the Iran-Iraq border and the Turkey-Iraq border, Iraqi Kurds have already got autonomy and equivalent rights so as that they do no longer could desire to combat everybody, and likely the US has been popular to help terrorists interior the previous so this isn't any marvel. The PKK terrorists additionally get help and coaching from Israel. yet do no longer hardship, the Iranian and Turkish protection rigidity are doing a great job kicking their butts all the time.

Answer 4

If we prove Iran is enriching uranium to weapons grade, we will attack. We will only attack nuclear and military targets, but rest assured, we will attack....and we should.

alBaridei (sp) said today that he feels Iran can be ready with a nuclear weapon in 6 months. That is scary because he is no friend of the US.

If he can show facts, either Israel or the US will be attacking.

Why do you think two carrier groups are sitting off the coast of Iran now?

Answer 5

At the heart of it all, neocon, liberal, independent, whatever...no one really wants another war in the middle east. I doubt seriously we will engage in a war with Iran. But you have to consider a few things: we will not and cannot allow this Iranian regime to pursue a nuclear weapon. Once it has one that changes everything. We consider Iran a rogue regime, a supporter or terrorism, and a loose cannon. Our problem is that we have a government that is unwilling to talk to Iran about it, they seem to think threats are a better way to handle diplomacy. It's a dual edged sword.

Answer 6

America is a continental. USA is the best word means for United State of America.
Iran is the best place and the Iranian mostly educated and have developed their country to be the best among Arabs / muslims.

I dont trust anyone from USA or Israel. They are terrorist and want to invade all opportunities from the pain of others. Just look what happened in Afghanistan and Iraq. More people been killed, massacre, raping and spuring hatred among muslims ( to kill each other to fastening the massacre and cover up that USA is innocent ) by using CIA and Army Intelligent.

Answer 7

Are the Iranian people aware that if the Iranian government commits any kind of attack on the US or US interests that most people in the United States will hold all of Iran responsible. So before you start mouthing off against Americans, remember that we will not forgive you if your country is responsible for attacking the US or our allies. I should also hope that the Iranian government is not so foolish to unleash nuclear weapons or else you can kiss your precious country GOODBYE! America will wipe up the floor with your backwards sandbox of a country. If the Iranians set off a nuke, you can forget about compassion for the Iranian citizens.

Answer 8

Neither.

We all know quite well that it's only Ahmadinejad speaking for the ayatollahs pretending there are US threats against Iran - made up by them out of whole cloth.

My guess is the purpose is to undermine the Iranian majority who like yourself would prefer to see regime change in Iran by fostering a fake reason for "nationalism", Them Against Us.

I'd think Iranians are about disgusted with the thugs those ayatollahs pay with Iran's oil money to keep moderate Iranian majority "in line".

Answer 9

It is about protecting Saudi Arabia from the majority religious group in Iran from being the majority in Iraq which may spread to Saudi Arabia and overthrow the royal family. Or to control the oil that the world will need at the end of oil in order to stay rich as long as possible.

Answer 10

Your so called pro American Iranian people should be hostile toward all that the extreme Shiite clergy and your deluded leader, Mahmoud, supports - the Revolutionary Guard, jihad, Hezbollah and all of the other fanatical terrorist groups.
If you believe what you write in your question, an American invasion should solidify all of the "pro American" people and help you to strive for your independence. If not, you'll have to redefine what you mean by "pro American" to me.
I'll have no concern what so ever of what the "pro American Iranians" would or would not support should the United States find it necessary to remove your demented and fanatical leader whom you complain of "dominancy over Iranians."

And don't flatter yourself, it won't be for your oil.
You're oil won't deter the two aircraft carrier battle groups presently stationed directly off your shore.

Answer 11

Same old story - rally around hating an enemy. Bush is trying to do the same thing here by making Iranians the bad people. He won't succeed because the people of the USA don't like him now.

I don't think Bush is propping up the current regime on purpose, it is -as I said above - not about Iran to him, it's more about his power base in the US.

Don't listen to the idiots who are angry with you simply because you are Iranian, they are already pawns in the Bush power game and don't deserve a second thought.