2007-02-21 14:51:31 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Should Anna be buried next to her only son.
My answer is no.
What we should learn is to always have an updated will.
Take care of ourselves for our children needs us.
There is a baby that will never know her mother because she didn't know how to take care of herself.
2007-02-21 15:00:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ABSOLUTELY NOT. Even if Anna Nicole said at some point in her life that she would like to be buried in CA, I am sure she never had any idea that her son would predecease her. She was so distraught when he died, I am sure that what Howard testified to stating that after her sons death (which is the most recent statement from her) that she told him she wanted to be buried next to her son. That is where she should be buried. Why should her son's body be exhumed and moved to Texas (which Anna's mom want to do). Anna Nicole took special care and had special thought in where she buried her son and Anna should be buried next to him. It is obvious her mother has no idea a real love between mother and child or she would not be in court - she would be helping to bury Anna Nicole next to her child.
2007-02-21 15:02:26 · answer #2 · answered by CuriousJen 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. I think Anna Nicole should be buried in the Bahamas next to her son. She loved her son and chose to bury him there. I think she would want to be buried by her son. From what I understand, she was somewhat estranged from her mother.
2007-02-21 14:59:43 · answer #3 · answered by kelsey 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Her mother is grieving for her daughter and cant think about the right thing to do.
I think Anna would have wanted to buried next to her son.
2007-02-22 00:45:46 · answer #4 · answered by Grogan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, i think she should be able to bury her daughter. but on the other hand, anna did say she doesn't want anything more to do with her. but her mom was fearing for anna's safety. so yeah i think her mom should be the one to bury anna.
2007-02-21 15:00:44 · answer #5 · answered by Shorty 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think of her husband has the suitable to be certain the place she is buried, yet basically by using fact she and her on the spot family individuals had some problems, do no longer count variety out distant kinfolk that would have certainly enjoyed her. i'm confident that they could want her buried with something of the family individuals. in spite of this, inspite of the indisputable fact that, if she had Daniel buried removed from the family individuals, she is entitled to the comparable comprehend. i think of it may be undesirable to have a court docket be certain something that would desire to be a family individuals's accountability.
2017-01-03 06:37:39 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No . She bought two plots in the Bahammas .One of them was for her .The other for her son . Her son is there and she should be with him . Good question .!
2007-02-21 15:00:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are sick
get a life
stop the evil gossip
2007-02-21 16:02:34 · answer #8 · answered by spin free 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well you can say it is now clear where anna got her gold digging ways,and her intelect........mom.....should get a big kick in the *** to hell
2007-02-21 15:20:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋