Why do Liberals Blame Everyone for Terrorism except Terrorists?

Question

It is almost incredible to me that so much Western opinion appears to buy the idea that the emergence of this global terrorism is somehow our fault. . . .Tony Blair

It is also rubbish to suggest that Islamist terrorism is the product of poverty. Of course, it uses the cause of poverty as a justification for its acts. But its fanatics are hardly champions of economic development.
Furthermore, the terrorists' aim is not to encourage the creation of a Palestine living side by side with Israel but rather to prevent it. They fight not for the coming into being of a Palestinian state but for the going out of being of an Israeli state. Blair yesterday

Answer 1

Because Liberals are uneducated and moronic.

Tony Blair Rocks, George Bush Rocks.

Liberals suck, generally Bill Clinton.

Answer 2

Dude.
Why are you making absolute statements?
Why are you saying Liberals Blame everyone for terrorism except terrorists? Did all liberals in the world come up to your house and tell you "Dude, I really think everyone is to blame for terrorism but terrorists! Not Osama Bin Laden, not Al-Qaeda, not them, BUT everyone else!"

Another thing...
I am not American and it's not a lie that the idea many people have of the U.S. is negative. I live in Latin America and I know that that is the impression many people have. Here are some ideas, for one, do you think that the unpopular war in Iraq is helping the American cause? No, it's creating more hatred towards the U.S. What does hate create? Terrorism!

Yes, terrorists ARE blamed for terrorism but there are other causes to terrorism. Poverty and social inequities create terrorism. When people have nothing better to do, nothing better than join a terrorist group, it's for a reason. I guarantee you that if for one, Afghanistan were a more prosperous countries, the Al-Qaeda militia wouldnt have been that big. I mean, seriously think about it.

Im not saying poverty causes terrorist attacks. However, there are many factors, like poverty, that might lead people in less developed countries to become terrorists.

Answer 3

How would you know when you yourself are one. Every time you mention the word, you become an extension of that hateful method. You become and instrument of that which you claim you are fighting. Don't you see that? Your party has become the propaganda machine for terrorists. It's all you folks keep talking about. Who needs threating tapes from the their hidden leader? You got chucklenuts and you quoting him in your speeches. AWAKE! Please brother. You're dealing with some dark forces, they can overtake even the well meaning. I understand that what happened six years ago was dreadful, but don't let it make you into a megaphone for their dying movement. Yeah, we'll catch those people. The kind of which you speak are depraved criminals and they will be investigated and eventually busted. Let the law do its work. The president has nothing to do with that anyway. Nor does our military. The depraved criminal doesn't need atraining camps, so there are no training camps to get rid of through war. We cannot accomplish anything but misery for our neighbors and ourselves by attempting to rule world with the childish point of view espoused by Rush Limbaugh. This war thing is a money scheme in the short term, mixed with some geopolitical theory testing in the long term, perhaps some messianic visions of one world empire. Wouldn't that be nice! I don't know, perhaps it would, but not through indefinite, infinite war. There's GOT TO BE ANOTHER WAY. Oh, yeah, I said what the other way was already. Let the law get after those criminals. Make our army into an instrument of construction, not destruction -- Oh I'm sorry, what do they call it today. "Reconstruction" Ah yes. I repeat, these are dark dark forces that are swirling around the Savage nation take on things, sometime even good people can get seduced by it. I am praying for you and all who think the way you do. Please stop talking about those criminals on a daily basis. That's how you defeat them. They inflict fear and they love it when they are spoken of often, because it extends their sick reach! Let the buck of terror stop with you.

Answer 4

I saw Alec Baldwin saying that it was Bush's fault for allowing 9/11 to happen.
Its like this: If a terrorist puts a gun to someones head and says to the govt, "If you don't give me a jet, I am going to kill this guy."
Then the govt refuses to get a jet. The terrorist shoots the hostage. All of the Liberals say that it is the govt's fault that the guy died. They never blame the man pulling the trigger.
It is hard to not let stupid people get you down. Just remember, they don't get it and they never will. Their judgment is clouded by a desire for everyone to be winners. They always have blamed the achievers for other's failure. They make the mistake of thinking that everyone thinks logically, and can be reasoned with.

They don't see that if nobody loses, then nobody wins.

Answer 5

Dan Rather, Wolf Blitzer, Cokie Roberts, and a tough old U.S. Marine
Sergeant were all captured by terrorists in Iraq. The leader of theterrorists told them that he would grant them each one last requestbefore they were beheaded.

Dan Rather said, "Well, I'm a Texan; so I'd like one last bowlful of hot
spicy chili." The leader nodded to an underling who left and returned
with the chili. Rather ate it all and said, "Now I can die content."

Wolf Blitzer said, "I am an American, so I'd like to hear 'The Star
Spangled Banner' one last time." The leader nodded to a terrorist who had studied the Western world and knew the music. He returnedwith some rag-tag musicians and played the anthem. Blitzer sighed anddeclared he could now die peacefully.

Cokie Roberts said, "I'm a reporter to the end. I want to take out my
tape recorder and describe the scene here and what's about to happen.Maybe someday someone will hear it and know that I was on the job tillthe end." The leader directed an aide to hand over the tape recorderand Roberts dictated some comments. She then said, "Now I can die happy."

The leader turned and said, "And now, Mr. U.S. Marine, what is your final
wish?" "Kick me in the ***!" said the Marine. "What?" asked the leader?
"Will you mock us in your last hour?" "No, I'm not kidding, I want you to kick
me in the ***!" insisted the Marine. So the leader shoved him into the open,
and kicked him square in the ***. The Marine went sprawling, but rolled to
his knees, pulled a 9 mm pistol from inside his cammies, and shot the leader
dead. In the resulting confusion, he leapt to his knapsack, pulled out his M4
Carbine and sprayed the Iraqis with gunfire. In a flash, all the Iraqis
were either dead or fleeing for their lives.

As the Marine was untying Rather, Blitzer, and Roberts, they asked him,
"Why didn't you just shoot them in the beginning? Why did you ask them to kick
you in the *** first?"


"What," replied the Marine, "and have you three report that I was
the aggressor?"

Answer 6

What makes you think of in simple terms so-observed as "liberals" do blaming. there are multiple "neoconservatives" on the bandwagon now too. a team of militia generals, some CIA and FBI analyists, some Republicans, ex- government officers, a plethora of books by potential of specialists, some previous human beings who comprehend a thank you to vote and a team of Gold movie star mothers who lost their youngsters in Bush's invasion, and families of youngsters who have been maimed, techniques broken and extra. There are farmers in the heartland blaming, college pupils and intense college youngsters who've the nerve to positioned on anti-Bush teeshirts (and get kicked out of school) and there are multiple non-liberal leaders of different international locations who perform a little blaming, too. different than, they do no longer seem to be blaming "absolutely everyone" as you assert, they are blaming your Bush administration! you're a brainwashed propagandist who makes use of those comparable previous set words like "liberals" and "terrorists" like there is not any day after today. whats up, word Terrorist: awaken and get with this methodology. you comprehend you're on the incorrect section.

Answer 7

Because they want the terrorists to win. They hate Bush so much that they want him to have a failed foreign policy. They are practically allies of the terrorists along with most of the major news media.

Answer 8

No, terrorists are to blame as well. It is just that those people wouldn't have a reason to be insane if we would adopt more practical foreign policies.

It is only Bush that thinks that terrorists want to destroy freedom. Even the pentagon says that terrorism is usually in response to anger over government policy.

In regards to Israel, terrorism happens because of anger over how Israel treats others. Israel kills hundreds of Palestinians every year and Palestinians are just suppose to be happy about those deaths according to our government.

Answer 9

Good question. The only thing that makes sense to me is that they are brain damaged from all the drugs they used in their youth. I can't think of another reason not to blame terrorists for terror, can you?

Answer 10

Seems to be true in part. They place too much blame on the current administration when Slick Willie could/shoulda done something when he had the chance. But let's not forgive Dubya and Dick C completely. They surely are accountable for some of it.