English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Assuming we are right is arrogant. People, cultures and society have different views and opinions about events and to say that we are the only ones who are right, is very wrong.

2007-02-21 14:15:18 · answer #1 · answered by Groovy 6 · 2 0

Being "right" at the national level is not the same as being "right" at the individual level.

At the national level, the administrator has to configure "right" to include many different aspects of the condition, some of which the individual will object to because it is not in his/her favor.

Countries do things that can be called "wrong" from an individual point of view because countries operate on the point of view of the "majority" instead of the individual.

On this program there are many people who think our President is wrong and there are many who think he is right. He has to think of which position is best for the country and that's how he operates and that's how he should operate..

2007-02-25 17:37:42 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Been there 4 · 0 0

Maybe we have different objectives. The British believe they can turn their duties over to the Iraqi Security Forces. They were guarding the oil fields to prevent bombings.
The US does not feel the Security Forces are ready to defend against the terrorist yet. We have 158,000 soldiers to replace. The British have remove 1,600 & Denamrk removed 470.
You can see why the Iraqi Security Forces would have trouble replaces 158,000 trained military personel. It seems so logical to me & I guess our administration that I do not understand the problem with understanding.

2007-02-21 22:25:44 · answer #3 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0 0

Pretty much. Few people opposed Hitler in the 30's, so 50 million people died as a results. At least now our admin has the will to stop Sadam and save potentially the lives of millions, not to mention our own as terrorists are all tied up in Iraq and leaving the US alone. The rest of the world does not care enough to stop a Hitler.

2007-02-21 22:17:17 · answer #4 · answered by Lighthearted 3 · 1 3

This administration is wrong for what they do to propel their actions. Lets manipulate data, to fool america so that we can go to war, but in that go after the wrong country.

Lets hide details that would incriminate the president, lets kill any investigations that might hurt the president (last 6 years where republicans controlled both house and senate), lets be unable to recall the information when tough questions are asked, lets let IRAQ government get away with killing our troops without having to set benchmarks, lets misspend billions of dollars that help civilian contractor rather than equip our troops, and lets lie about all that.

lets pretend we support our troops, when we dont train them, dont equip them, rush them into battle, fail to rehabilitate them when they are injured, fail to depose fallen bodies properly to their familes.

Lets inflate terrorism numbers to scare america into believing in this war.

the worlds not perfect, but this administration is hurting our troops and our country more than any other country or terrorist act ever has

When 65% of america agrees with me, its kinda hard to argue...although die hard bush supporters will try.

2007-02-21 22:20:13 · answer #5 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 3 1

If believing in freedom for all mankind is wrong, I'd rather be wrong all day long.

The rest of the world disagrees with us because the hate us. The hate us because our little experiment is the best in the world.

Kinda like, don't hate me because I am beautiful.

2007-02-21 22:18:43 · answer #6 · answered by ric9757 3 · 0 3

Of course. Only whackos question Bush's administration.

2007-02-21 22:16:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Regarding what issue?

2007-02-21 22:16:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes. Everyone else seems to be listening to the mainstream media.

2007-02-21 22:15:59 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 2

Yup!
Some times you have to stand alone.
Is it better to cause a minor fender bender, knowing that it will stop a major pileup?

2007-02-21 22:21:52 · answer #10 · answered by Wonka 5 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers