Pro - great looking 2 seat roadster that is eating Mazda's lunch all around (the Miata is better? please ask any automotive journalist - the Solstice is all but a unanimous pick, even against the BMW Z4!), RWD, great performance, rare.
Cons small trunk, little storage, etc. But who cares?
Compared to the Skye, it's the same car with different body lines. All else is exactly the same. Some like the Skye, some like the Solstice (like me). I've had the opportunity to see them side by side, and to me the Skye's lines are too sharp. The Solstice is a smoothy...
2007-02-22 04:22:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by InjunRAIV 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
From each article ive examine, the sky is thru some distance the extra effective vehicle. the considerable reason is by technique of the fact with all of the alternatives on the solstice that the sky has the fee of the solstice jumps as much as over 500 extra suitable than the sky... strange... and there is the recent severe preformence sky... identity say the sky, yet its like evaluating an Explorer to a Navaho, its (maximum all) contained in the trim equipment.
2016-12-18 08:19:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
pro-cheap fun
con-i dont like the styling i prefere the Sky, passenger and luggage room, performance
its really the same except for the styling and nuts and bolts here and there
2007-02-21 14:42:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by cars_o_holic 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the sky is just a rebodied solstice
Pros: Fun to drive, good car, looks good
Cons: Sky looks better, miata is a better car all around, small interior and trunk.
2007-02-21 15:31:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kyle M 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
other than basic styling difference, sky suspension is supposed to be a little bit smoother ride
2007-02-25 00:29:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by wolfwagon2002 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Awful ride & underpowered. Look at a mustang!
2007-02-22 07:15:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by justcurious 6
·
0⤊
2⤋