if so, should he have his heisman revoked?...give legit reasons for whether or not he's guilty!
2007-02-21 12:50:00 · 14 answers · asked by sabes99 6 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
i don't think any of us can comment on his innocence or guilt. we have been given a lot of media spin, but none of us have been given any of the hard evidence.
do i think he's guilty? probably so. but then again, i'm sure there are hundreds of players out there who have been given extra benefits too.
give back the heisman? doesn't matter. he's making millions now and vince young probably wouldn't accept it (unless he's a crybaby)
2007-02-21 14:22:37 · answer #1 · answered by loveholio 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like he's guilty to me.
Bush jumped ship when he figured out how to make money on his own and now that guy who brought him up is pissed off and telling everything.
Heisman should be revoked due to the term "in good standing" for a heisman. He cheated just like Barry Bonds and Pete Rose. Also the National Championship in 2004 should go to Auburn since they should have had a share of it anyway. Dumbass media and voters can't see when you go undefeated in the SEC your should get a chance to play for the NC. Looks like they figured it out after Florida wupped Ohio st all over the field.
2007-02-21 21:00:28 · answer #2 · answered by pozitive thinking 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah he should get his heisman revoked cause he took the money and is now saying he didn't he also talked to the RB that got recruited by USC and says he didn't even though the guy said the conversation with Bush helped him choose or something like that, probably told him how to get money from sponsors
2007-02-21 20:54:54 · answer #3 · answered by Marco 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If they prove him guilty i believe his Heisman should be revoked and given to Vince Young. Peter Warrick was a favorite for the Heisman however he was catch getting discount from Dillard and he was not liable for the Heisman.
2007-02-21 21:03:06 · answer #4 · answered by meanmachine4242 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes he is guilting and no his heisman shouldn't be revoked. This kinda stuff happens a lot and its just a matter of who gets caught or not. Whats important is that reggie has good work ethnics and he worked himself into a heisman running back.
and he's not admitting it because he's afraid of the consequences.
2007-02-21 20:58:28 · answer #5 · answered by Edwin L 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ABSOLUTELY. There is video evidence, and it is only a matter of time until his Heisman is stripped and given to Vince Young.
And YES, Young is a crybaby.
2007-02-22 00:18:01 · answer #6 · answered by drbuns 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he's guilty they already found evidence,proof that he was paid because they have a recording of it. it doesnt matter what happens to the heisman because now he's in the pros anyway.
2007-02-21 22:02:28 · answer #7 · answered by freestyler19320 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
even if he gets his heisman revoked no one will care hel still be remembered as one of the most electifying backs in college football history and its not like he did somthin huge either so
2007-02-21 21:07:25 · answer #8 · answered by stu 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think ALL college star players @ major programs are guilty of some sort of NCAA rules violation.
2007-02-21 21:34:06 · answer #9 · answered by Scottie Boy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah but who cares? All those guys are getting paid anyway, he just trusted the wrong people.
2007-02-22 11:45:28 · answer #10 · answered by Marvin P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋