1) There are thousands of witnesses with nothing to gain by coming forward, especially commercial pilots and military officers.
2) It basically comes down to who's word do you trust. Do you really believe the official line over these witnesses?
3) If one person saw something, then it could be anything. However, if groups of witnesses are seeing the same thing? Mass hallucination? Are they all mistaken?
4) If you need physical proof, consider these sightings are of things that don't touch the ground. How do you acquire physical evidence?
5) What might a jury conclude? Yes, it is all circumstantial, but the evidence is heavily corroberated.
6) Why don't they land on the White House lawn? If there is an intelligence beyond our own, they would realize that their presence would taint our culture forever, destroying something we could never get back.
I don't know what is going on, I just am not satisfied with what I've heard.
2007-02-21
12:35:10
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Wait a Minute
4
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
I'm sorry, I can't buy all of these sightings are U.S. defense aircraft since they tend to defy the laws of physics.
2007-02-21
13:05:15 ·
update #1
Eyewitnesses who have nothing to gain and everything to lose reporting their sighting. Using Ockham's razor" says it best to go with the simplest, most natural explanation. The simplest explanation would be that those individuals and groups actually saw what they had reported.
2007-02-21
15:35:01 ·
update #2