2007-02-21 12:30:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
you can't compare a WR to a RB.
2007-02-21 12:44:04 · answer #1 · answered by jcenathuganomics 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are two different positions, but is the question who would i rather have on my team. That is far too easy Reggie Bush his potential outways the numbers colston put up. Bush will develop his skills on the ground and can turn nothing into something, where as colston needs someone to get him the ball. Both players are great players but Reggie Bush has the potential to be as good as Barry Sanders. He has the speed, power, and agility to become the best running back / returner of all time.
2007-02-21 12:48:49 · answer #2 · answered by max m 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
colston should have won rookie of the year this year or atleast offensive. i would say colston was better this year by far but in the future reggie bush will be one of the best running backs in the league and colston will probably be a great wr/te for a while too but nothing compared to what reggie will be.
2007-02-21 13:49:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is comparing Apples to Oranges, but I will put it this way:
Among WRs, Colston is easily in the top dozen receivers in the whole NFL.
Among running backs, Reggie Bush is probably barely in the top 25.
So...Colston is better.
2007-02-21 16:16:56 · answer #4 · answered by drbuns 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Marques Colston
2007-02-21 13:37:37 · answer #5 · answered by football chick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What Hester and Washington do as much as Bush aka no longer lots different than return a punt. Leinart no longer in all risk he dropped interior the draft and he remains enjoying at the back of Warner. Bush is a bust and so is youthful. Mario Williams is a stud. MJD and Deangelo Williams and Cutler and Marshall are studs. Colston has one off year and he became a seventh around p.c.. provide him a wreck. WOW. Marcus Vick? no person stated he became going to be solid besides.
2016-11-24 22:55:04 · answer #6 · answered by jewson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Marcus Colston. Reggie Bush has not lived up to his expations.
2007-02-25 11:20:25 · answer #7 · answered by Travis C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is kind of an impossible question, because they play different positions...but i will say that colston did his job better throughout the season and does his job better in comparison to other wideouts...not taking anything away from bush, he is a phenomenon and will be one of the best when he's done barring injury, but last year colston came out of nowhere to be a nightmare for teams...if he hadn't gotten hurt he would have led the NFL in receiving yards and TDs almost for sure
2007-02-21 12:34:43 · answer #8 · answered by sabes99 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
last year colston was better but i think reggie will be a better player in the years to come and colston will disappear
2007-02-21 12:44:50 · answer #9 · answered by YawkeeFan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both are very good talents -- colston appears to be a # 1
wideout in the making
bush looks to be a very versatile back both running & catching
the ball out of the backfield ( think brian westbrook ) -- he
will touch the ball 2 / 3 times per game over colston ----
because they play different positions they will contribute at
different levels -- to compare them head to head is akin to
the apple / orange comparison
2007-02-21 13:21:51 · answer #10 · answered by grumpy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all it is Marques Colston, but I think Colston did better this year, but reggie will get better. GO SAINTS!!!!
2007-02-21 13:02:07 · answer #11 · answered by stephengdog 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋