2007-02-21 11:55:59 · 12 answers · asked by FOX NEWS WATCHER 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
would that taint its fair and balanced reporting?
2007-02-21 11:56:32 · update #1
It might as well be ... or rather, you mean it's not???
2007-02-21 11:58:45 · answer #1 · answered by nanlwart 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I believe it shouldn't because if it is, that might be the first step in nationalisation. That is when the government slowly starts taking over companies and the media without the people noticing since they are doing it slowly. As everyone knows, history repeats itself and in the past nationalization has lead to authoritarian governments almost all the time. Do you really want an authoritarian government.
2007-02-21 20:02:40 · answer #2 · answered by Dougy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It used to be But Bush asked them to do it as a charity.
Go big Red Go
2007-02-21 20:05:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I thought it already was. Isn't Sean Hannity on speed dial from the oval office?
2007-02-21 19:59:40 · answer #4 · answered by apple juice 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
it already is
it is soooooo biased towards the right. Billo makes up his own facts
2007-02-21 20:00:30 · answer #5 · answered by Whiz 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, but the Republican Party should.
2007-02-21 20:07:19 · answer #6 · answered by someone 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Despite its CEO *admitting* that he deliberately tried to slant his news toward pro-war propaganda?
No.
2007-02-21 20:03:49 · answer #7 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
NO. Why would we want the government to screw this up.
2007-02-21 19:58:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hell, why not? We fund the VERY left PBS....
2007-02-21 20:04:57 · answer #9 · answered by Jadis 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You mean it isn't?!
2007-02-21 20:07:27 · answer #10 · answered by alessa_sunderland 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋