Do you consider being gay as normal as being straight? Or some kind of genetic abnormality?

Question

Please don't hate me for this, but I don't think that being gay is the normal way of nature. Think about it, a man has a penis, a woman has a vagina. The natural instinct of humans and animals is to reproduce. That's just human nature. With homosexuals, it is not possible to reproduce, therefore it can not be the normal natural way. I think that there could very well be a "gay gene". All of this being said, you are born how you were born and I believe that no matter how you were born, you should have the same rights as everyone else. So, I support gay marraige.I just don't like how some gay people try to force the fact that being gay is as normal as being straight, which its not, based on the evidence above. I know that gay people don't want to think that they have a deformity, but, its not normal. Please, if you have any evidence to prove me wrong, say so in a non offensive way because I am not trying to offend anyone in any way. Thank you.

Answer 1

Just some food for thought:

1) People often cite the apparent bodily design of men and women (penises, vaginas, and the fact that they can interlock during sex) as evidence of heterosexuality's naturalness. Yet may I also point out that men come equipped with prostate glands inside their rectums, which respond to stimulation that is able to be applied through anal sex? What does that bodily fact mean?

2) The natural instinct of humans and animals is to produce, it's true. So far that I've seen, lesbians and gay men don't lose that desire, considering how many adopt and have children! Homosexuals, in fact, can reproduce, thanks to current technology like sperm donation, in vitro fertilization, and surrogate motherhood.

3) What is natural is what happens in nature. And homosexuality occurs in the natural world- many animals practice it. We can talk about whether or not homosexuality is 'normal', but we can't talk about whether it's natural or not, because the mere fact that it occurs in nature validates it as such.

4) There is so much diversity in the natural world. It's intriguing how in our human vision, we tend to see the majority as being what's good and right, and anything else is an abnormality. I suppose, by technical definition, anything in the minority is, indeed, an abnormality, but does that mean that it's not "normal", in the conventional sense of the word "normal"? What is "normal" but a societal label, that is relative to who is judging and their criteria? Why does it have to be either-or. Why can't both homosexuality and heterosexuality be both normal?

Those are just some issues to contemplate in your search for truth on this matter. Hope it helps!

Answer 2

Then finally the at once human beings could finally comprehend what that is desire to be condemned on something they can't administration. The psychiatric hospitals could be flooded. wish that could by no skill take place. i'm at once yet i'm all approximately equivalent rights. optimistically sooner or later society and the government will finally comprehend we are all equivalent and deserve equivalent rights, no remember what your sexual determination is. i'm saddened to stay in a rustic that may not enable 2 people who love one yet another to marry by using fact they basically so take place to be the comparable intercourse.