English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have learned that liberal's do generate the exact opposite of their stated intent. When a liberal asks for some thing i know it;s not good for the country. And it mean's the opposite of what they want or ask for. So if they say their going to support some thing that really mean's their not going to support it. That's a liberal !!!

2007-02-21 10:49:47 · 12 answers · asked by Sketz 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

The Liberals in our Government don't even know the differents between a Republic and Democracy just listen to them . Let alone whats good for a Repubic since they don't know the differents. Why do you think inflation go's up. When you pay a cashier $10.00 hr. And illegal's over running our country. Thats the liberal way. Pay 5$ for a candy bar.Thats the liberal way. Yes Liberals generate the exact opposite of their stated intent.

2007-02-21 11:58:20 · update #1

12 answers

Yes I think you are right,although sometime they accidentally tell the people erectly what they mean.That's when they lose elections.

2007-02-21 11:05:15 · answer #1 · answered by shawnn 4 · 0 0

No, liberals generate exactly what their "agenda" is. Socialism instead of "Democracy". The liberals believe that the US Government, (Washington DC), should take care of the people instead of the people governing the country, the way its suppose to be. If you have the lawmakers taking care of the people, then you have socialism, even on the very edge of being communism. Thats not what this country is built on. We send representatives to the capitol in our stead, to speak for what WE want for the good of our nation, not the other way around, since when do we as Americans WORK for the politicians, they work for us, we put them there. Please understand the difference between a free democracy and a ruler inspired socialist government, go to your history books and see the difference From the Czars that ruled Russia, to the Communism that ruled the USSR (Russia), to the breakdown of the failed governmental policies of the kind of government. Good Luck.

2007-02-21 11:02:44 · answer #2 · answered by tennman012000 3 · 0 0

Well, they don't--actually it is other political parties that implement the legislation incorrectly at the local level to drum up support for their own policies and political party. It is only possible since Constitutional law was revoked and martial law was enacted with the Patriot act; otherwise, individual rights would be enforced which they no longer are not. Only in communism is a group responsible for the actions of one person, in the USA individuals are responsible. Individuals are not required to answer to the group for their beliefs although there has been an attempt to alter the concept of individualism through a more socialized teaching process. Individuals are held to communal scrutiny in order to discover whether they are in fact sociopaths.

2016-05-24 04:39:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. The important thing to the liberal crowd is good intentions. Results are not important. For example, the goal is to provide a living wage for underpaid workers. The solution is to raise the minimum wage. That's it. Good intentions are what's important. Those who point out that many underpaid workers will lose their jobs and have no wages, fail to understand that the stated intent is what's important. If you disagree with a liberal by pointing out that the effect of their policies is really rotten, what they hear is that your intentions are contrary to theirs. Since their intentions are pristine and perfect, you must be a bad person. Really bad. Not even deserving basic human rights.... They are that stupid. Damned liberals.

2007-02-21 10:59:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Especially when they know that their ignorance about the condition will have a positive effect on their negative action.

Usually the dominant groups, who make the erroneous decisions concerning the negative part of their positive actions, are the ones who fail to attain the necessary approval for their reverse actions.

2007-02-25 09:06:16 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Been there 4 · 0 0

Why don't you cite some examples of what you are talking about.
These statements lack proof of what you are saying & to me, really doesn't make much sense. Don't get me wrong, I do understand what you are asking/stating but perhaps you could word it another way & give some examples to back up what you have written.

2007-02-21 11:03:10 · answer #6 · answered by geegee 6 · 0 0

So the best thing is to stick with failed Republican policies that serve only the rich? I'd say you need a better plan.

2007-02-21 11:04:07 · answer #7 · answered by ToYou,Too! 5 · 0 0

No, you're confusing liberals with backwards world. Paranoid, much?

2007-02-21 10:53:50 · answer #8 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 0 0

At the best, they never solve the problems that they set out to.

2007-02-21 11:48:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hahaha... I wish we could take away everything that liberals have done for this country... so you could see what your utopia would really be like...

and to answer your question.. .no

2007-02-21 10:54:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers