What is the impact when one political party controls both houses of Congress and the White House?

Answer 1

There's often less oversight.

Oversight is crucial to a healthy democracy and a healthy government.

When there is essentially card blanche to do whatever you want, people abuse that power more often than not.

Answer 2

The impact is normally that the majority party obtains more power to move their agenda without checks and balances. This is what has occurred over the past 6 years.

A more precise answer is that an imbalance occurs. The only good part is that it takes more than a majority in the Senate on most legislation (60 votes not 50)

Answer 3

Rampant corruption and a complete lack of oversight.

Witness the gutting of the US Constitution in the last 6 years, the suspension of Habeas Corpus and the illegal detention of thousands of persons without charges or trials.

Witness a NINE TRILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT in 6 short years, with no corresponding upgrades in Homeland Security. You can't tell me paper airport slippers cost this country $9 Trillion

And WHEN, in God's Name, did America decide to embrace TORTURE as a legitimate interrogation tool? Anyone who supports a President who would support torture no longer believe America is better than that, and they simply want us to descend to the level of the terrorists.

Answer 4

background has shown that this door is going the two methods and by using the 1st 0.5 of the bush administration it did. in the congressional elections the universal public of people chosen the democratic occasion to symbolize them in congress so the universal public is being served. it quite is actual that corruption could ensue yet you may keep in mind corruption is often modern-day in government while the objective is potential. regardless of what politicians carry forth, their significant objective no remember if or not they % to admit it or not is potential and the persons come 2d with a view to assert those issues are a results of occasion majority in government is an over-generalization. in addition to, Obama is stressing Bi-Partisan action wherein not each and every subject is dictated via which occasion the representatives belong to, it quite is how government could be quite run. there heavily isn't an absolute stability between the events in seats of government, regardless of the undeniable fact that with the appropriate management we are in a position to get rid of the stubbornness of congressional contributors in vote casting so as that actual progression could be made particularly of petty occasion votes. ultimately in one in each and every of George Washington's very final presidential speeches he warned of a 2 occasion equipment, believing it could tear on the very fabric of democracy. So it style of feels that particularly than proceed with the status quo it's time to upward push above this subject it quite is destroying the effectiveness of our government.

Answer 5

You get a president like the one we have now, you get a do-nothing House and Senate like we had until the November elections. You get a lot of "yes" men and women who kiss the presidents behind, cozy up to the lobbyists and generally ignore what we want and spend as little time as possible doing the peoples business.

Answer 6

Just look at the last six years. There's less balance in the decisions that get made, and fewer people are held accountable for those decisions.

Answer 7

ask mr. G.W.B. the difference between now and six months ago. I think that's the impact from someone who's experiencing it first hand.

Answer 8

A War on Terror! A dictatorship.

Answer 9

Depends upon the desire to "obstruct",from the other side of the aisle...