English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When did you find out he is nothing but a drunken deserter that went AWOL ? http://www.awolbush.com/

When did you find out he lied through his teeth about Saddam being addicted to WMD?

2007-02-21 09:56:08 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

30 answers

i agree with you. there was no possible way for the towers to come straight down, do to a plane hitting them. It is plain physics, nothing and i mean nothing falls onto itself like the towers did,and that was a perfect drop. So i believe the attack is a bunch a BULL. jUST do some research on how buildings fall and then you will feel the same way!!!

2007-02-21 10:06:57 · answer #1 · answered by duke 2 · 5 3

Before he won the first election by theft for question #2.

For #1, I had my suspicions from the first day. After all, this is what they did when they organized Pearl Harbour in the '40's. The very same modus operandi

Create a problem
Let the people fear
Offer a preplanned solution and then use the opportunity to remove more rights and freedoms in the name of "safety".

As for Saddam, since he murdered many of my ex-husband's family, I have had loathing of him for a decade. As wrong as things are now, I did not care how that American created monster was put down like the rabid dog he was. To be honest, I have a feeling Saddam did have many very awful things in his armory of genocide, but they did not have the technology for WMD. I knew this from what my husband told me, and since he was very very highly placed at one time in the local military, I believed him. Gases and guns and torture were Saddam's style.

I will say one thing for him. Despite the circumstances around him, Saddam met his death with dignity. He was also a creation of the Illuminati and the Bush cabal. As was bin Laden. When they were done with them, they cut them loose and you can see what we have now.

Check out a few of my links:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=_6uivnkd1uo.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysmdaf-ga...
http://www.infowars.com/photos.html........
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/fema.htm...
http://www.illuminati-news.com/quotes.ht...
http://conspiracycentral.info/index.php?...
http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/bloodline...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0p-hvpjpt...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evu_paipl...
http://www.cremationofcare.com/index.htm...

http://www.biblebelieviers.org.au/masoni...
History of the Masons, the Knights Templar, etc

http://www.oldamericancentury.org/galler...
Absolutely exquisite political cartoons. You don't even have to read.

http://www.cuttingedge.org/News/n1878.cfm
http://www.freedomtofascism.com/.........
http://www.hereinreality.com/news/rand.h...
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/bushco...
http://video.google.ca/url?docid=-670819...
http://video.google.ca/url?docid=7860484...

Please enjoy and share these.

NOTE:

As for all of you who think we are crazy or say rude things, please do not say you were not warned.

Obviously the constant repetition of lies by the media, fed them from their owners, IE FAUX a Bush station, has proven the case that people really do start to lose their common sense and believe the lies fed them as fact. It worked for the Nazis! Now it works for their descendants in America.

Remember, Communism was the first trial run.
Nazism was the second trial run.
Pol Pot was another social experiment.
Now Nazism is back in full force and the gang are really making progress.

It is obvious you chose only the answer that agreed with you. Time to wake up and smell the coffee sweetcheeks.

2007-02-21 18:32:17 · answer #2 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 6 0

I had my suspicions the second he blamed Al Queada, then in almost the the next breath tried to implicate Saddam. I had been very well informed on Bush's' past and I knew certain things about him like a) He is a pathological liar B) He is shameless in his ability to say one thing and do the exact opposite. C) Take credit for other peoples work D) Reward friends (those that contribute to election campaigns) with really good jobs that they are woefully unqualified for. E) An absolute belief in his above the law and his omnipotence among us rabble. F) His hunger for revenge for real or imagined slights. G) Incompetence. H) His tendency to surround himself with self serving "YES MEN" where LOYALTY trumps competence. I) Tendency to blame others when things go wrong.
Then with the revelation that his brother was head of security of the company in charge of the security of the towers, that by the way powered down buildings couple weeks prior, did some strange wiring, then ordered the removal of bomb sniffing dogs. Bush's brother gave that order I forget if it was Neil of the Saving and Loan 300Billion rip off or Marvin. But COME ON!!!!!....Mary

2007-02-21 18:24:43 · answer #3 · answered by mary57whalen 5 · 6 1

Bush didn't blow them up. It's the elite high-ups that are responsible for all that. Bush is just a puppet. But anyway, I woke up in July '06. When I found out the truth, all admit, I was scared sh-itless, and halfway didn't believe it. Then you do some research on how jet fuel couldn't burn as hot as they said it did, and how the WTC were constructed and their tollerences to different things and it starts making sense.

But don't believe me, go do your own research. And I don't mean those conspiracy theory debunking sites, because I can debunk them. See some good documentaries by Alex Jones. He's been called a conspiracy theorist for years, but he proves everything with eye witness accounts, declassified govt. documents, and scientific proof.

Yes our President lied about WMD's. That's proven. It's been on every channel. Why do you think Colin Powell resigned. Maybe a little too much govt. coverups for him to handle. Hell the former head of the CIA during the Reagan administration has come forth about how our government sponsors terrorism, and says 9/11 was an inside job.

2007-02-21 18:08:50 · answer #4 · answered by Ted S 4 · 5 3

When did you find out that this question is full of holes? Had you taken the time to do the research on al Queda and Osama Bin Laden, you would have known that OBL and Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri cowrote and cosigned a fatwa, or a religious binding edict, and here is the text of that fatwa:

The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies- civilians and military— is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque (in Jerusalem) and the holy mosque (in Makka) from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty Allah, 'and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together,' and 'fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah'.

That answers question #1. Bush had NOTHING to do with 9/11, and you need to do some factfinding in to al Queda and Osama Bin Laden.

Second, people need to quit finding President Bush's faults (such as in the way of the supposed awol and his being a drunk) and start looking at what he has done - right. First of all, there hasn't been a terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11, and because of this Administration's efforts, there was a huge terror plot that was broken up overseas.

As for WMD's in Iraq - they were there. Saddam admitted to it at one point, but you'll never hear this, because you only hear what the mainstream media wants you to hear. If I am coming off as crude or mean, I apologize, but I'm sick of hearing people say "Bush did this, Bush did that". Right now, it doesn't matter because he was VOTED in twice. Let the man do his job, and thank God that Hillary Clinton isn't president. We'd have all been dead by now.

2007-02-21 18:08:08 · answer #5 · answered by c.grinnell 3 · 3 4

I began to suspect when I saw the buildings pancake so rapidly--steel frame buildings don't do that.
And when a 3rd WTC building--not hit by a plane--also collapsed.
No doubt in my mind that our gov't was involved.
I'm sure jr didn't know about it. That doesn't mean shadow elements of our gov'd weren't involved, maybe indirectly (letting the terrorists get away with it), in concert with the terrorists (remember bin was a papabush ex-employee) or directly.
In '99 the neocons (rummy, chaney et al.) advocated invading Iraq but stated that the American people wouldn't stand for it UNLESS there was a "Pearl Harbor"-type event to goad them. That paper was published in '99, it's a matter of record.
And what event was 9/11 immediently compared to?
If you said Pearl Harbor give yourself 10 points.

2007-02-21 18:07:47 · answer #6 · answered by AlphaMale 2 · 6 4

Bush wouldn't have the brains to plan 911.

Google: PNAC for your answer...

2007-02-21 20:52:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I knew about the AWOL and drunkenness before 2000. On WMD I figured it as soon as he said it. Later things I have read simply confirmed he was in on the 9/11 thing and that he knew there were no WMD.

2007-02-21 18:02:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 6

Um. Never.

I find it hysterical that people who think that Bush could pull off an impossible conspiracy to destroy the WTC and keep it covered up ALSO think that he is the most incompetent president in the history of the Union.

If Bush can pull off the WTC conspiracy, why not also plant WMD in Iraq and take away that Liberal political ammunition?

Never gotten a satisfactory answer to that.

2007-02-21 18:01:46 · answer #9 · answered by Citicop 7 · 8 5

Thank you for bringing to light this horrible misdeed, and subsequent cover-up and sham of a war. I have lost two loved ones and thousands of fellow Americans because of this arrogant monster. I say we storm the white house and drag them all kicking and screaming to the guillotine

2007-02-21 18:04:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8 4

fedest.com, questions and answers