So You Don't Believe 9/11 Was A Conspiricy?

Question

Since conspiricy means more than 1 person was involved, if you don't believe the events of 9/11 was a conspiricy you must believe that 1 person flew all 4 planes that crashed.
So for all of you non-conspiricy folks, please explain how it was possible that 1 person was able to fly all 4 planes at the same time, with no one else ever being involved in the planning & execution of the plane hijackings/crashes?

Answer 1

I do! The whole scenario cannot be coincidental. Everything was well planed. We in general, as Americans are the best people on this planet. We are educated, ethical, generous, caring and loving people. However, our government in general is the most hypocrite and corrupted one on earth. I believe in my American people, but I have no faith in our government. Bush's administration knew about the attack in advance and failed to protect us on purpose, just to fulfill their agenda. It is all a master plan by the neocons to get Iraqi Oil and eventually Iran's Oil as well. I am not saying that our government ordered the 9/11 attack, but they allowed it to happen. Our government (republicans and democrats) are considered guilty in my opinion. Terrorists are bad creatures in nature and I refuse to blame the devil. All this money spent on Iraq and Afghanistan could have been wisely spent on securing our borders and skies. I blame our government. Well, perhaps u may call it a Conspiracy! May God Bless our country!

Answer 2

So all you believe is that it's a conspiracy. So you believe that there were WMD's in Iraq and Bush is good, and the govt. is good. You need to wake up man. Seriously...

There's an overwhelming amount of evidence to prove what that worthless piece of crap (9/11 commision report) says. They never touched ground about building 7. They said that the WTC towers didn't have the 43 steel pillars that were the central columns of which is was built on.

Ok, I really don't have time to write for hours on how to debunk the crap you think. I'll just put out some simple facts for you to try and research:

1. The janitor of WTC 1, William Rodriguez was there the whole time. He witnessed the large explosion that came from the Sub-levels of WTC 1. He saved 100people from that building because he was the only one with the master key. The 4 other people already abandoned the building. He encountered numerous explosions after the plane hit. Now you're probably thinking from what the BS 9/11 truth debunking sites say that the jet fuel burned through all 43 columns and the building collapsed.

2. Jet fuel with oxygen forced into the mixture will burn at about 1800deg F. Steel has a melting point of 2800-3000deg. The buildings were rated for being able to withstand 2000deg F heat for several hours, and take multiple hits from a fully loaded Boeing 707(largest plane at time of construction, though a 767 is in similar dimentions). Even if the steel columns melted, there's no way a building would fall at near-freefall speeds in on its own footprint. Let's just say the building starts to pancake-like collapse. Then add in 1/2 to a 1sec per floor. That would still end up being 35-70secs to collapse building 1. In videos of the collapse you can clearly see squibs(blast points from charges) going off anywhere from 10-20 stories below. Building 7 was never hit by a plane. It had 2 small fires, and amazingly collapsed in on its own footprint at freefall speeds. There's CNN clip of firefighters and policemen telling people to stand clear, that they're bringing down the building. Now that we know it's a demolition, there's no way they could've planted explosives in the ubilding during the afternoon. Something like that takes weeks to coordinate.

3. Now if a plane hit the Pentagon, why were all these agents demanding gas stations and small businesses that had security cameras to turn over their footage and to be quiet about what they saw? Why was the wreckage in such tiny pieces? Why was the turbofan propeller from the plane about 6ft in diameter shorter than that of a 9ft Pratt and Whitney engine of a Boeing 757? Why were only 5frames from the security tower at the Pentagon released and not the entire reel? These are just some of my own questions. So if the plane vaporized from the explosion, how come they had DNA samples to prove that it was the passengers?

Can you answer these questions? I didn't think so.

Answer 3

I believe that the only conspiracy involved with 9/11 is the ones in the minds of people that shouldn't be allowed on the streets without supervision.

Everything was admitted to by OBL on video and they even have tapes of a couple of the terrorists who flew the planes.

It's an open and shut case.

Answer 4

There were only two planes...the ones that were flown by remote control into the WTC. A missile hit the Pentagon. They shot a missile into the ground to represent flight 93. Wtc building 7 was the command center...so at the end of the day...they blew that building up to get rid of all the evidence. Bush lied about Saddams WMD. Also did you know Bush is nothing but a low down drunken deserter that went AWOL?

http://www.awolbush.com/

http://patriotsquestion911.com/
911 TRUTH.ORG
REOPEN 911.ORG
PUBLIC ACTION.COM
SERENDIPITY.LI
APFN.ORG
911 ATTACK ON AMERICA.COM

Answer 5

Good job changing the subject. Conspiracy among terrorists is not the same as conspiracy in the government.

Answer 6

Conspiricy...Yes.by the Muzzie Terrorists....but not by the CIA or GW as the Tinfoil hat crowd is ranting about.....Its sad...they rant and call him a moron...then... say he was smart enough to fool the world and destroy the twin towers...I guess Merck cant make the anti-psycotic drugs fast enough to help them...

Answer 7

Ok, you win. According to the literal definition 9/11 was a conspiracy. Score one for the conspiracy nutjobs.

Answer 8

wow, flawed question here.

You mean to say government conspiracy? Obviously more than one person flew the planes, that doesn't mean the govt. had a direct involvement or knowledge.

Answer 9

It was an attempt to disgrace the Bush presidency by the liberals They are were so distrot over losing the election they were getting even with the American public

Answer 10

INSIDE JOB is a better term.