I am extremely happy that I was never cut. I've never had a problem with p.e., but that may be unrelated to my intact state.
Sex is great for me and for my wife. Did you know that 90% of adult women prefer UNCUT men? http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html
Some cut guys last TOO long - and eventually have to pull out and finish by hand. I've never heard of an intact guy having that problem, but it seems pretty common in those who've been chopped.
2007-02-21 14:44:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Maple 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
About 82% of the world population are uncircumcised. In America, the rate is currently around 35% of men. That's because America remains the only country that routinely circumcises for anything other than a medical problem or a religious belief.
Circumcision rates have dropped sharply in America in recent years - in 1968 they reached a peak when 90% of newborns were circumcised.
As far as lasting longer, no, that is down to technique. If you want to last a long time, look up 'tantric sex' on Google.
However, uncircumcised men have far more nerve endings on the shaft of the penis, and the head is more sensative, so they get more sensation during sex - the feelings are more intense.
2007-02-21 11:14:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I didn't, it's hard (no pun intended) to say if the sex lasted any longer than with those who were. In fact I have been told that not having the fore skin would make it last longer because the head of the penis is desensitized. But I am glad I wasn't because I am more sensitive there and enjoy it more than those who were.
2007-02-21 09:37:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dale 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
I'm uncircumcised, and have read studies online that have found that both essentially last almost the same amount (both in the six minute range). The uncircumcised group lasted a few seconds less, and I'm guessing that is caused due to the higher sensitivity. So really, it depends on the guy and what you're doing. :)
2007-02-21 11:55:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jorge 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
My guy didn't have one and I wouldn't say he lasts longer. But the guys I've been with who are uncircumcised are the only two who have been multi orgasmic and can *** four or more times at once. Very sensitive but in a good way, more like a woman.
2007-02-21 13:12:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am uncut.
I last a long time, but it has nothing to do with being uncircumcised. I practice tantra.
Interestingly, uncut men are much more sensitive down there, and we totally enjoy sex on a deep level. So, if anything, uncut men come quicker than cut men, becuase our head is not desensitized as are those of cut men.
Lastly, as a sidenote, women have told me that uncut men are sweet tasting.
2007-02-21 09:37:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jack Chedeville 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
My husband isn't circumcised and he said it (penis) is more sensitive because it is always protected by the foreskin. As far as lasting longer. That takes practice on the guys part.
2007-02-21 10:13:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by little Glo 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
will sex is better cause you actually have extra skin sliding back and forward to give u more of a sensual feeling also extra inch of thrust. down fall you have to keep it clean more often. not necessary sex last longer it really depends on each and individual state of mind and how you really control it.
2007-02-21 09:49:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Justaman 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am cut
and I have been told sex feels better with skin
and that the skin makes you feel more faster
O'Well
smile
good luck
2007-02-21 09:54:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I didn't. But I can't tell if sex last longer for me since I didn't, can't compare. So long you could satisfiy you partner (though not everytime), and you enjoyed yourself too. Who cares!
2007-02-21 11:14:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Fish Master 5
·
2⤊
0⤋