Entering? Bush's imperialistic foreign policy is the definition thereof. Invading, occupying, setting up the gov't and military bases. Stealing natural resources.
Get in the game---It's what this Neo-con agenda is all about. Except they don't call it that. Their definition is fighting terroism.
2007-02-21 09:14:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by scottyurb 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the middle east, oil is the most importantreason for any group to want to colonize it. But Africa is not much gold plenty now and I don't see any reason for any colonization.
2007-02-21 17:08:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Azaraksh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes to your question but it goes even deeper than that. We are being colonized by the poor of Mexico and Central America, while we in turn re-colonize China with consumer goods.
The world, as Thomas Friedmann says, is flat.
2007-02-21 17:06:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Buffy Summers 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you kidding? Its the Middle Eastern nations who are colonizing Europe, and Mexico is colonizing the USA!
2007-02-21 17:05:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
China is trying to re-colonize africa to exploit it's resources.
2007-02-21 17:02:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by infobrokernate 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. I see no chance of this happening, mainly because the western countries just aren't interested in doing that.
2007-02-21 17:02:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Follow the OIL trail for your answer: IRAQ, Iran, venezuela...
2007-02-21 17:03:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Everyone wants freedom.
2007-02-21 17:02:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, I think we need to let those places go to hell and the people allow darwin to decide the final outcome.
2007-02-21 17:02:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
To give them anoth reason to complain??/ Hell no.
You cannot educate savages. It takes hundreds of years, even if you live with them.
2007-02-21 17:03:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by type2negative 4
·
0⤊
2⤋