2007-02-21 08:19:01 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Elizabeth was quite successful at walking a middle path between Catholics and Protestant, even overriding certain anti-Catholic ventures approved by Parliament. Ahem!!! Don't believe all the answers you read here -- so many people with so many axes to grind.
2007-02-21 09:16:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
To be suitable, extra like the fabricated from a closed circle of royal relatives, senior aristocracy and the Palace corporation, which meant, and in all hazard nevertheless potential to an quantity, that a lot of her international is seen via a distorting glass. by potential of how, British absolutely everyone isn't 'matters', that's an exceptionally insulting expression, yet 'voters'. And on a similar time as the majority are royalist in one way or yet another, an excellent minority might desire to work out a civilised, lawful transition to a republic.
2016-10-16 04:49:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For a start Catholics were burned at the stake and a lot of anti-Catholic persecutions took place.
There was a musical rennaissance in full fling, though, and various influential musicians were employed at her court, giving rise to a flourishing of English music.
Shakespeare was also fully encouraged in his work, with obvious ramifications.
Empire became a popular aim.
2007-02-21 08:31:01 · answer #3 · answered by Z 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well she basically ruled during the time
2007-02-21 14:57:29 · answer #4 · answered by Mike J 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋