If one is an anti-abortionist, pro-Bible, or anti-homosexual chauvinism, one is considered a fanatic. But... vehemently anti-war, anti-Bush, pro female, homosexual, or pro minority chauvinism and the Liberals consider one to be a 'patriot'.
Is the country loosing the battle against Newspeak? Nothing really 'means' anything anymore.
2007-02-21 07:06:20 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I wish I hand an answer for you. However, the only thing I can come up with is the activism in FAVOR OF the above issues.
For an example, the legislative bill HR254 now being introduced into Congress for passage, makes it ILLEGAL for the Churches to preach against the homosexual lifestyle and that they will lose their Tax Exempt Status if they do.
(I hope activist read this) IF THEY DON'T WANT GOD IN SCHOOLS, IF THEY WANT TO REMOVE GOD FROM THE MONEY THAT'S OKAY. BUT IF FREEDOM OF RELIGION MUST BE CONTROLLED BY GOVERNMENT, THEN THIS IS NOT ONLY COMMUNISM IN IT'S PUREST FORM, THEN THERE IS "NO SEPARATION" OF CHURCH AND STATE.
People just don't get it, do they?
We ALL NEED TO MAINTAIN OUR RIGHTS ACCORDING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.
What is at risk is "FREEDOM OF RELIGION" AND "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" which is being blasted by a handful of minorities. The Christians haven't stopped caring...but the minorities ARE inflicting their will on our beliefs.
ANY activist or organization that seeks to change OUR RIGHTS for which the Constitution was written are no less than Communists Aggressors.
2007-02-21 07:23:17 · answer #1 · answered by chole_24 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those who base their beliefs on a religion, and strongly enforce them on others are fanatics by definition. The anti-war crowd is fanatical, the anti-Bush crowd is fanatical. Being fanatical means you accept the dogma of what you were taught and approach the subject with a closed mind. It's a dangerous brainwashing mentality that should be avoided.
2007-02-21 07:18:26 · answer #2 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
while it comprises immigration, alot of liberals agree there's a large issue. BTW, the persons in this us of a who're on welfare via the main important numbers are white. third, so some distance as being non secular, in simple terms given which you're non secular does not advise you're ethical or righteous. Many Christians and Catholics consisting of the church homes capitulated with Hitler and with slavery in this us of a. Being non secular does not make you suitable, it makes you a believer, it does not immediately make you righteous and ethical.
2016-12-17 15:30:05 · answer #3 · answered by hirschfeld 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
blowing up abortion clinics, can you understand how that killing to protect philosphy gets you labeled radical. anti bush. anti iraq war is just intellegent thought and no liberals bomb any conservatives over their differing opinions
2007-02-21 07:24:37 · answer #4 · answered by doc_of_three 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sometimes they "hurt others feelings"
Opposing point of views are unacceptable to the Elitist Liberal mind set
2007-02-21 07:15:14 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Both of those examples seem fanatical.
2007-02-21 07:12:48 · answer #6 · answered by ldnester 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Man you aretrying to appeal to liberals logic. Dont repeat my mistake..
2007-02-21 07:16:52 · answer #7 · answered by type2negative 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It started in the garden of Eden, and evolved from there.
In the end, it's all good!
.
2007-02-21 07:24:41 · answer #8 · answered by Rob D 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Being open-minded means only agreeing with those who agree with you.
2007-02-21 07:11:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋