I mean look at who they are running. New York Mayor Richard Jewels, and that Senator from Arizona that Bush said was pro-Breast cancer.
2007-02-21 06:59:27 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
bfsabresix I want fries with that boy.
2007-02-21 07:14:10 · update #1
Of course they are! They need Dems to get the US out of the mess they caused. It's like we're PARENTS cleaning up after irresponsible children.
2007-02-21 07:07:45 · answer #1 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, he gained that conflict. regrettably, having learn the bill, i'll assert the extra beneficial suitable than 1000 pages carry numerous 'little traps'. Like: medical privateness? Who desires it? yet on a similar time as i start up off this is going to be an notably long answer... in fact, Obama's words have been disingenous at dazzling and designed to deceive, in spite of if the careful determination can't be outright denied - very like this immigration concern. In clever words, whilst you're no longer any extra in Congress or a union, optimal can no longer shop their cutting-area-day plan, the government IS 'taking on' well-being care in determining what all regulations, public or inner optimal, will pay for and in designing the main suitable 3 regulations which could be accessible no count if from public or inner optimal source, and in saying we will not purchase drugs from canada yet they gained't negotiate them down in value, the two. and there is not any reasonable danger lowering $550 billion from medicare's already insolvent fund won't shrink centers. besides to, in the event that they actually theory it does no longer, why are they changing the properly-widely used of care medicare recipients are entitled to to 'low-fee' care from 'medical desire'? of direction there is an element the area you medically might desire some concern, and that they intend to disclaim it as 'no longer low-fee'. So there have been extra beneficial lies than fact indoors the substance of Obama's speech. The question is, did he comprehend it?
2016-10-16 04:39:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They dont have to throw the election. After the fiasco that is Bush, they will easily lose the election.I mean at least the Democrats can fix their mess. Bush has been in Iraq for years with no freaking idea of how to win. What a great President he is.
2007-02-21 07:04:22 · answer #3 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Guliani would be a very good president I think. He cleaned the crime of NYC by sending crime upstate, maybe we can send crime out of the country!
Guliani also was a very pushy mayor of a city of 8 million people. He got things done. And most of all he got voted in by the people.
Bush, got nothing done in Texas, and was voted in with the help of his father.
alex
2007-02-21 07:14:29 · answer #4 · answered by alco19357 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, they plan on going against their ideals and vote for the pro-gay rights, pro-abortion and pro-gun control Giuliani. They hate the Democratic party so much that they are willing to vote for a RINO.
2007-02-21 07:04:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No their not
Republican WIN in 2008 guaranteed after America sees how the Dimwitacrats rule both houses in next two yrs
2007-02-21 07:06:59 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
no chance there trowing it and besides, roaring economy, surging national pride, lowest unemployment rate in 20 years, you cant just list the bad thing, besides rudy is probibly the front runner and out of everyone running id only vote for him or obama, besides democrat would piss themselves in a war situation and would pull out colapsing iraq and everything around it and doing more harm than good, we need to keep the republicans in so that our country doesnt turn into the world stepping stone
2007-02-21 07:12:00 · answer #7 · answered by bufsabre666 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't think that McCain, Guiliani, Huckabee or Romney would agree with you. They're working real hard to get the nomination.
2007-02-21 07:05:56 · answer #8 · answered by Sean 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2007-02-21 07:05:20 · answer #9 · answered by Cut The Crap 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Healthcare, medicare, prescription drug costs, unnecessary major tax cuts for the rich, illegal immigration, the wars...you name it. Their best candidate is a LIBERAL republican! They will surely not win.
2007-02-21 07:05:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋