if the white house says the British pulling out of Iraq is a good sign then would a better sign be the u.s. ?

Question

pulling out? and do you think that sign wont happen until just before the next elections?

Answer 1

The British where oposed to pulling out but you guys are bored now it's costing too much money.

Answer 2

There is in simple terms no longer a pullout of troops from Iraq until eventually some thing drastic takes position to rigidity one of those element. There are on the prompt 14 everlasting military bases in Iraq, equipped at tremendous cost to American taxpayers. Iraq is likewise the residing house of the international's best and maximum intense priced overseas embassy with over 1000 workers, in effortless words 6 of which absolutely communicate the community language.

Answer 3

An even more telling sign is that Denmark, super-strong ally of the US and the UK, is pulling ALL their troops out of Iraq by August. It's a small country and a small force, but they've become the first of Bush's "coalition" to say "Enough is enough". Good for them.

Answer 4

I think they are only pulling out 1/5 of their troops. We need to see things through or face the music in our own country.

Answer 5

Honestly? I'm not at liberty to say what is really going on, but the short answer would be: Not for another year, it just wouldn't be a smart move at the time.

Answer 6

I think it shows that Tony Blair has a heck of a lot more intelligence than our own "leader" and "decider". Bush will ride this right out of office because he has no clue how to end it.

Answer 7

The White House doesn't always say what they really mean. It's spin.

Answer 8

I see London, I see France, I see Gabby's underpants.

Answer 9

yes we will be there until a new president takes office .

Answer 10

your probably right.