http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070221/ap_on_el_pr/clinton_obama
2007-02-21 06:43:01 · 13 answers · asked by Quickie 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Let the Democrats kill each other.
2007-02-21 06:43:24 · update #1
Well considering there is no one to kill on the Republicans side except who I respect, Guliani. But there's no competition on the Repubs side. So I guess that's no news aye?
2007-02-21 06:51:29 · answer #1 · answered by alco19357 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow, Did you see what the Democratic State Senator from South Carolina said ? Just in case, I'll post it here . He said that if Barak Obama gets the Democratic Presidential Nomination, he/Obama would bring down the Democratic Party because HE's BLACK' !!!!!
Bad news for Dems = Good News for Reps !!
Now where's the Nationwide Outrage over that comment ?
2007-02-21 14:56:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
your vote is manipulated, the fact that it is so obvious should be a clue. give me a break. a black man and a women. This is america, land of bigots. you want to know who the next president is? Rudolph Giuliani. he's been bought by the Rockefeller's. he will be trumped as an American hero. don't trust this government, or any of it's bought and paid for politicians. the rockefellers of the world finance ALL the candidates, republican and democrat. WAKE UP AMERICA. google fabian socialist google ten planks of communism. google Money Masters.
"Those who would trade freedom for safety deserve neither"
Ben Franklin
2007-02-21 15:03:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
not really...wouldnt a democratic party that is really interested in making america a better place be better off without the clintons and their vindictive policies of slamming everything they dont like...so what if someone doesnt support hillary...this is america..like she says..people can change their minds....lord knows shes changed her mind and positions often enough...everytime a new poll comes out, she has a different stance on a position...as forhim...read his book, you will see what kind of socialist he is versus what kind of socialist hillary is...
2007-02-21 14:50:31 · answer #4 · answered by badjanssen 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
and... nobody cares...
she's mad one of his donors said something? since when can politicians control their donors or would even want too?
they are only responsible for those under their leadership, not their donors... that's a silly move Hillary is making and it's likely to backfire on her, since I'm sure some of her donors probably all don't keep their mouths closed...
2007-02-21 14:49:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Kinda like Bush's people in Noth Carolina in 2000,spreading rumors that McCain's adopted Cambodian daughter was actually his illegitimate black child?No,I guess not.
2007-02-21 14:52:44 · answer #6 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LOL, this is just the beginning, LOL.
They attack each other guised as campaign workers, LOL.
While Juliani is gaining in the polls.
2007-02-21 14:51:17 · answer #7 · answered by Jay J 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If Hillary's involved you know it's going to get dirty. She won't let anything or anyone stand in her way of socializing America.
2007-02-21 14:48:56 · answer #8 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nothing those two do is good for America.
2007-02-21 14:47:38 · answer #9 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
HAHAHA i laufed my a** off when i heard that on the news =)
2007-02-21 14:47:25 · answer #10 · answered by Corey 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋